Healthy lifestyle behaviors, mediating biomarkers, and risk of microvascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study

Healthy lifestyle behaviors, mediating biomarkers, and risk of microvascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study

Abstract

Methods and findings

This retrospective cohort study included 15,104 patients with T2D free of macro- and microvascular complications at baseline (2006 to 2010) from the UK Biobank. Healthy lifestyle behaviors included noncurrent smoking, recommended waist circumference, regular physical activity, healthy diet, and moderate alcohol drinking. Outcomes were ascertained using electronic health records. Over a median of 8.1 years of follow-up, 1,296 cases of the composite microvascular complications occurred, including 558 diabetic retinopathy, 625 diabetic kidney disease, and 315 diabetic neuropathy, with some patients having 2 or 3 microvascular complications simultaneously. After multivariable adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, history of hypertension, glycemic control, and medication histories, the hazard ratios (95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} confidence intervals (CIs)) for the participants adhering 4 to 5 low-risk lifestyle behaviors versus 0 to 1 were 0.65 (0.46, 0.91) for diabetic retinopathy, 0.43 (0.30, 0.61) for diabetic kidney disease, 0.46 (0.29, 0.74) for diabetic neuropathy, and 0.54 (0.43, 0.68) for the composite outcome (all Ps-trend ≤0.01). Further, the population-attributable fraction (95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CIs) of diabetic microvascular complications for poor adherence to the overall healthy lifestyle (<4 low-risk factors) ranged from 25.3{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} (10.0{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, 39.4{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) to 39.0{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} (17.7{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, 56.8{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}). In addition, albumin, HDL-C, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A, C-reactive protein, and HbA1c collectively explained 23.20{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} (12.70{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, 38.50{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) of the associations between overall lifestyle behaviors and total diabetic microvascular complications. The key limitation of the current analysis was the potential underreporting of microvascular complications because the cases were identified via electronic health records.

Author summary

Introduction

Diabetes is a global public health crisis affecting greater than 0.5 billion adults worldwide [1]. Diabetic microvascular complications including diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, and diabetic kidney disease have placed a significant health and economic burden borne by individuals, families, and health systems [2,3]. For example, diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of vision loss, is present in nearly 30{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of patients with diabetes [4]. Furthermore, both diabetic kidney disease and diabetic neuropathy may develop in approximately 50{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of patients with diabetes [5,6]. Therefore, it is paramount to identify cost-effective strategies to prevent and delay the development of microvascular complications in patients with diabetes.

Beyond the glucose control by medications, the American Diabetes Association guideline has highlighted that both caregivers and patients should focus on how to optimize lifestyle behaviors to improve diabetes care [7]. Although lifestyle behaviors that are generally recommended, e.g., normal weight, no smoking, moderate alcohol drinking, healthy diet, and physically active, have been associated with lower risks of microvascular complications [814], to our best knowledge, the magnitudes of the joint association of multiple lifestyle factors with the development of microvascular complications in diabetes have not yet been quantified, which may have substantial public health implications on translating epidemiological findings to meaningful public health actions. In addition, several studies have linked lifestyle behaviors with a range of intermediate variables including lipid profile [15,16], liver function biomarkers [15,1719], renal function biomarkers [20,21], blood pressure indices [22], glucose metabolism measures [23], and systemic inflammatory factors [15,16]; however, whether and the extent to which these metabolic biomarkers could mediate the association between lifestyle behaviors and diabetic microvascular complications remains unclear.

To shed light on the potential favorable association of overall lifestyle behaviors on microvascular complications in patients with diabetes, we examined the joint association of multiple lifestyle behaviors, including waist circumference (WC), smoking status, habitual diet, physical activity, and alcohol intake with risks of total microvascular complications, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, and diabetic kidney disease among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who participated in the UK Biobank study. In addition, we also comprehensively evaluated the effect of a series of blood biomarkers on mediating the relationship between lifestyle behaviors and diabetic microvascular complications.

Methods

Study population

The UK Biobank is a large community-based prospective cohort study for common diseases of middle and older adults including over 500,000 participants aged 37 to 73 years from 22 sites across England, Scotland, and Wales between March 2006 and October 2010. Extensive data were obtained through touchscreen questionnaires, physical measurements, and biological samples at recruitment. Specific methods of data collection have been described previously [24,25].

Our sample of 15,104 was generated by including patients with T2D identified by using the algorithms method developed by the UK Biobank study [26] and excluding participants with prevalent macro- or microvascular complication cases, had incomplete information on lifestyle behaviors, or withdrawal from the study. The flowchart of patients included in the current study is present in S1 Fig.

The study was approved by the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee, the National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care in England and Wales, and the Community Health Index Advisory Group in Scotland. All participants provided written informed consent. In the current analysis, we employed the UK Biobank study to test a priori hypothesis; we did not publish an analysis plan before conducting analyses between January 2022 and March 2022. The associations between lifestyle factors and the risk of microvascular complications in participants without excluding those with macrovascular complications and stratified analysis by preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD) status were performed in response to peer review in July 2022. This study is reported as per the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline (S1 Checklist).

Measurements of lifestyle behaviors

Five lifestyle behaviors, namely, WC, smoking status, physical activity, habitual diet, and alcohol intake, were evaluated in the current analysis. We used WC instead of body mass index (BMI) to avoid the potential obesity paradox [27,28] as evidence found an obesity paradox when obesity was measured by BMI but not when measured by WC in patients with diabetes [29]. WC was measured using the Wessex nonstretchable sprung tape measurement, and low-risk WC was defined as <80 cm for women and <94 cm for men [30,31]. Data on smoking status were self-reported, and noncurrent smoking was defined as low-risk behavior. The frequency of all types of alcohol intake was reported using 6 predefined categories, between never to daily or almost daily. For participants who reported to drink alcohol, data on the average monthly or weekly alcohol intake from 6 types of alcohol beverages were collected. We calculated the average units of alcohol intake using the abovementioned information and defined low-risk drinking as moderate drinking (1 to 14 g/day for women or 1 to 28 g/day for men). Data on the type and duration of physical activity were derived from the questionnaire. Leisure-time physical activity score based on the 5 activities undertaken in the last 4 weeks was computed by multiplying the metabolic equivalent of task [MET] score of each activity by the minutes performed [32,33]. Light DIY (do-it-yourself), walking for pleasure, other exercises (e.g., swimming, cycling, keep fit, bowling), heavy DIY, and strenuous sports were given 1.5, 3.5, 4.0, 5.5, and 8.0 METs, respectively [34]. The midpoints of the frequency and duration of physical activities were used to calculate the time spent on each activity. We then classified the top third of the physical activity score as the low-risk group. In addition, we generated a dietary score to reflect the overall diet quality including 10 components, namely, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish, dairy, vegetable oils, refined grains, processed meat, unprocessed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Low-risk diet was defined as meeting 5 or more ideal diet components [35]. Participants with each low-risk behavior were assigned 1 point; otherwise, 0 points. The overall healthy lifestyle score was the sum of individual score of the 5 lifestyle behaviors, ranging from 0 to 5, with higher score indicating healthier lifestyle.

Assessment of the circulating biomarkers

Blood samples were collected from consenting participants at recruitment, separated by components and stored at UK Biobank (−80°C and LN2) until analysis. Blood biomarkers were externally validated with stringent quality control in the UK Biobank; full details on assay performance have been given elsewhere [36]. We selected the potential biological biomarkers mediating the association between lifestyle factors and microvascular complications based on knowledge of potential pathways, including glycemic control determined by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], triglycerides, apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein A), liver function (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma glutamyltransferase [GGT], total bilirubin, total protein, and albumin), renal function (cystatin C, creatinine, urate, and urea), inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], and white blood cell count), and blood pressure indices (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]).

Statistical analysis

Comparisons of baseline characteristics across the categories of the overall healthy lifestyle score were made using ANOVA or chi-squared test. We also compared the differences between patients included in the current analysis and those who were excluded due to missing values. Person-years were calculated from the date of recruitment to the date of death, first endpoint, lost to follow-up, or the end of follow-up, whichever came first. The lost to follow-up variable in the UK Biobank has been created by amalgamating data from 5 possible sources: (1) Death reported to UK Biobank by a relative; (2) NHS records indicate they are lost to follow-up; (3) NHS records indicate they have left the UK; (4) UK Biobank sources report they have left the UK; (5) Participant has withdrawn consent for future linkage. The end of follow-up dates were 1 April 2017, 17 September 2016, and 1 November 2016, for centers in England, Wales, and Scotland, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of individual lifestyle behaviors and overall healthy lifestyle score with risks of total and individual microvascular complications in patients with T2D. We imputed the missing values of covariates (≤7{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) using multiple imputations by chained equations with 5 imputations (SAS PROC MI with a fully conditional specification method and PROC MIANALYZE). Linear regression model and logistic regression model with all the covariates in the fully adjusted model were used to impute continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively. The percentage of missing values are present in S1 Table.

Three models were built. In Model 1, we adjusted for age (continuous, years), sex (male, female), Townsend Deprivation Index (continuous), and race/ethnicity (White, others). In Model 2, we further adjusted for education attainment (college or university degree, A/AS levels or equivalent or O levels/GCSEs, NVQ or HND or HNC or equivalent or other professional qualifications, none of the above), sleep duration (<6, 6 to 8, or ≥9 hours/day), family history of CVD (yes, no), family history of hypertension (yes, no), and prevalence of hypertension (yes, no). Finally, in Model 3, diabetes duration (continuous, years), HbA1c (continuous, mmol/mol), use of diabetes medication (none, only oral medicine, insulin, and others), use of antihypertensive medication (yes, no), use of lipid-lowing medication (yes, no), and use of aspirin (yes, no) were additionally adjusted. Further, restricted cubic spline analysis was applied to test dose–response relationships between the healthy lifestyle score and risks of outcomes. We also calculated the population-attributable fractions (PAFs) using the {e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}par SAS Macro (https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/donna-spiegelman/software/par/) to estimate the proportion of microvascular complications that could theoretically be avoided if all participants adhered to 4 or more low-risk lifestyle behaviors.

Mediation effects of biomarkers on the associations of overall lifestyle score with risks of total and individual microvascular complications were evaluated using mediation package in R. Indirect, direct, and total effects for each mediator were computed via combining the mediator and outcome models with the adjustment of all the covariates in Model 3. Nonparametric bootstrap resampling was used to compute the CIs of the proportions of mediations. We selected the available biomarkers from the UK Biobank for the mediation analyses based on knowledge of potential causal pathways to predisposing to microvascular complications or mortality [19,3740]. The selected biomarkers were considered as potential mediators following two-step analysis. First, we assessed the associations of all biomarkers with the overall lifestyle score using the multivariable-adjusted linear regression models. Second, we evaluated the associations of biomarkers that were significantly associated with the overall lifestyle score, with risks of all the outcomes using the multivariable-adjusted Cox regression model. We then chose the biomarkers significantly associated with each outcome for the mediation analysis accordingly.

In addition, stratified analyses were conducted by age (≤60, >60 years), sex (female, male), education (less than college, college, or above), diabetes duration (≤3, >3 years), use of diabetes medication (yes, no), and HbA1c (≤53, >53 mmol/mol). Interactions between the overall healthy lifestyle score and stratified factors on the risk of outcomes were examined using the likelihood ratio test by adding product terms in the multivariable-adjusted Cox models. Further, we examined the associations of different combinations of low-risk lifestyle behaviors with outcomes.

Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of our results. First, to minimize the potential reverse causation, we performed the analysis among patients with T2D after excluding the cases that occurred within 2 years of follow-up. Second, we generated the overall lifestyle score using low-risk drinking defined as moderate alcohol drinking and never drinking and repeated the main analysis using the new lifestyle score. Third, we constructed the healthy lifestyle score using BMI or waist-to-hip ratio instead of WC. Fourth, we generated a weighted healthy lifestyle score and examined the associations of the weighted healthy lifestyle score with risks of outcomes. Fifth, we investigated the association between the overall lifestyle score and risk of diabetic kidney disease, and mediation analysis for diabetic kidney disease with additional adjustment for kidney function biomarkers. Sixth, we performed the analysis via including the patients with CVD (n = 3,397) at baseline and stratified the associations by preexisting CVD status. Finally, given the potential competing risk of death highlighted during the peer review process, we assessed the associations of healthy lifestyle score with risks of microvascular complications using both the cause-specific hazard model and Fine and Gray subdistribution methods.

We used SAS V.9.4 and R software version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) for all statistical analyses. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among 15,104 participants with T2D (60.3{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} male; mean age, 59.3 years), there were 3,406 (22.6{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}), 6,080 (40.3{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}), 4,062 (26.9{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}), 1,556 (10.3{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) having 0 or 1, 2, 3, and 4 or 5 low-risk lifestyle behaviors, respectively. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Participants with more low-risk lifestyle behaviors were more likely to be men, White, less deprived, highly educated, sleep recommended hours, have a lower level of HbA1c, and have a lower prevalence of hypertension. They were less likely to use aspirins and medications for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. In addition, compared the participants who were excluded due to missing values, those included in the current analysis were more likely to be men, White, less deprived, highly educated, noncurrent smokers, physically active, moderate alcohol drinkers, and eat healthier (S2 Table).

Lifestyle behaviors and outcomes

During 117,445 person-years of follow-up (median 8.1 years; interquartile range 7.3 to 8.8 years; maximum 11.9 years), there occurred 1,639 (10.9{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) deaths and 1,296 (8.6{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) composite microvascular complications cases, including 558 (3.7{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) diabetic retinopathy, 625 (4.1{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) diabetic kidney disease, and 315 (2.1{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) diabetic neuropathy. Among all the cases, one case of diabetic kidney disease was uniquely identified from death records. S3 Table shows the associations between individual lifestyle behaviors and all the outcomes. Being physically active, with lower WC, and moderate alcohol intake were associated with a lower risk of microvascular complications, while noncurrent smoking and healthy diet were not. The overall healthy lifestyle score was associated with lower risks of all the outcomes in a dose–response manner (all Ps for linear trend ≤0.01; Table 2 and Figs 1 and S2). Compared with participants with 0 to 1 low-risk lifestyle behavior, participants with 4 to 5 low-risk lifestyle behaviors had HRs (95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CIs) of 0.65 (0.46, 0.91) for diabetic retinopathy, 0.43 (0.30, 0.61) for diabetic kidney disease, 0.46 (0.29, 0.74) for diabetic neuropathy, and 0.54 (0.43, 0.68) for the composite microvascular complications, respectively. For each number increment in low-risk lifestyle behavior, there was a 13{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} lower risk of diabetic retinopathy (HR, 0.87; 95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CI: 0.80, 0.95), 22{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} lower risk of diabetic kidney disease (HR, 0.78; 95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CI: 0.72, 0.85), 27{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} lower risk of diabetic neuropathy (HR, 0.73; 95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CI: 0.65, 0.83), and a 18{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} lower risk of the composite microvascular complications (HR, 0.82; 95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CI: 0.77, 0.87).

thumbnail

Fig 1. Dose–response relationship of the healthy lifestyle score with risk of microvascular complications among individuals with T2D.

X-axis showed the numbers of low-risk lifestyle behaviors, and y-axis showed the HRs of the composite microvascular complications (A), diabetic retinopathy (B), diabetic kidney disease (C), and diabetic neuropathy (D). Black curves were HRs, and grey zones were 95{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} CIs. Multivariable-adjusted models were adjusted for age (continuous, years), sex (male, female), ethnicity (White, others), education attainment (college or university degree, A/AS levels or equivalent or O levels/GCSEs or equivalent or other professional qualifications, or none of the above), Townsend Deprivation Index (continuous), sleep duration (<6, 6–8, or ≥9 hours/day), family history of CVD (yes, no), family history of hypertension (yes, no), prevalence of hypertension (yes, no), diabetes duration (continuous, years), HbA1c (continuous, mmol/mol), use of diabetes medication (none, only oral medication pills, or insulin or others), use of antihypertensive medication (yes, no), use of lipid-lowing medication (yes, no), and use of aspirin (yes, no). All P-nonlinearity were ≥0.09 and all P for overall association were <0.001 (except for diabetic retinopathy: P for overall association = 0.008). CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; T2D, type 2 diabetes.


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004135.g001

In addition, the estimated PAFs of nonadherence to 4 or more low-risk lifestyle factors were 39.0{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} (17.7{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, 56.8{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) for diabetic kidney disease and 25.3{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} (10.0{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, 39.4{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}) for the composite microvascular complications (Table 2).

Mediation analysis

All the biomarkers were significantly associated with the overall lifestyle score except for total protein, lipoprotein A, and SBP (S4 Table). The associations between the selected biomarkers and all outcomes are shown in S5 Table. Six significant mediators were detected on the associations of lifestyle score with risk of the composite microvascular complications and diabetic kidney disease, namely, albumin, HDL-C, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A, CRP, and HbA1c. The relationship between the lifestyle behaviors and risk of diabetic neuropathy was mediated by cystatin C, GGT, total bilirubin, albumin, HDL-C, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A, CRP, and HbA1c with the proportion of mediation effect ranging from 3.22{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} to 11.35{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}. Collectively, the mediators explained 23.20{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, 24.40{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf}, and 31.90{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of the associations of overall lifestyle behaviors with composite microvascular complications, diabetic kidney disease, and diabetic neuropathy, respectively. In addition, our data showed that among all the potential biomarkers, only HbA1c was a significant mediator that explained 15.26{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of the relationship between the overall lifestyle score and risk of diabetic retinopathy (Table 3).

Secondary analysis and sensitivity analysis

Consistent results were observed when analyses were stratified by age, sex, education, diabetes duration, use of hypoglycemic medication, and HbA1c level. No significant interaction was observed between the healthy lifestyle score and the stratified factors on the outcomes considering multiple comparisons (S3 Fig). Further, the results of different combinations of low-risk lifestyle factors showed that the increased numbers of low-risk lifestyle factors were associated with graded lower risks of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic kidney disease, diabetic neuropathy, and the composite microvascular complications (S6 Table).

In the sensitivity analyses, the results were generally robust when excluding patients with events that occurred within the first 2 years of follow-up, defining low-risk alcohol intake as moderate drinking and nondrinking, generating the lifestyle score using BMI or waist-to-hip ratio instead of WC, or generating the overall lifestyle score as a weighted score (S7S10 Tables). The association between overall lifestyle behaviors and risk of diabetic kidney disease was slightly attenuated when estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was additionally adjusted, and the results of mediation analysis for diabetic kidney disease were largely unchanged with the additional adjustment of eGFR (S11 and S12 Tables). Further, we observed similar results when patients with preexisting CVD were included and in patients with preexisting CVD, although diabetic retinopathy did not reach statistical significance in patients with preexisting CVD probably due to the insufficient power (S13 and S14 Tables). Finally, consistent results were demonstrated when we used 2 competing risk models accounting for the death (S15 Table).

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort study of patients with T2D, adherence to a greater number of healthy lifestyle behaviors, including recommended WC, noncurrent smoking, physically active, healthy diet, and moderate alcohol drinking, was inversely associated with lower risks of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic kidney disease, diabetic neuropathy, and the composite microvascular complications. For each number increment in low-risk lifestyle behavior, there was an 18{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} lower risk of developing diabetic microvascular complications. Moreover, the results of PAFs suggested that 25.3{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of the diabetic microvascular complications could have been avoided if the patients with T2D had 4 or more healthy lifestyle behaviors. In addition, the mediators collectively explained 23.20{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of the associations between the overall healthy lifestyle score and diabetic microvascular complications. Specifically, CRP, albumin, HbA1c, and lipids profile (HDL-C, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein A) could explain 4.44{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} to 10.69{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of the association between overall lifestyle behaviors and the total diabetic microvascular complications.

Our study contributes to the literature regarding the influence of combined healthy lifestyle behaviors on the risk of diabetic microvascular complications. To date, many studies have been performed to evaluate the relationship between individual lifestyle behaviors and risk of diabetic microvascular complications; however, the joint association of multiple lifestyle behaviors with microvascular complications remains unknown. For example, the Irish Longitudinal Study showed that a history of smoking was associated with a higher risk of developing microvascular complications [8]. The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) studies demonstrated that adherence to a healthy dietary pattern (the Alternate Healthy Eating Index) [9], being physically active, and moderate alcohol consumption [12] were associated with a lower risk of incident chronic kidney disease among patients with T2D. Furthermore, general obesity and abdominal obesity were associated with higher risks of diabetic kidney disease [41], diabetic retinopathy [13], and diabetic neuropathy [42].

However, the results of lifestyle interventions on microvascular complications among patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance in clinical trials were inconsistent. The Steno-2 randomized trial including 160 patients with T2D and persistent microalbuminuria showed pharmacological therapies in combination with lifestyle behavior modifications, including adopting a healthy diet, engaging regular physical activity, and participating in smoking cessation courses, significantly reduced the risk of diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy [43]. Further, the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study including 577 participants with impaired glucose tolerance reported that healthy diet and exercise interventions in combination resulted in a 47{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} reduction in the diabetic retinopathy incidence, but no beneficial effects were observed for diabetic nephropathy or neuropathy [44]. In addition, the Look AHEAD trial consisting of 5,145 overweight or obese patients with T2D, which focused on weight management through increased energy deficit and physical activity, resulted in a significant decrease in chronic kidney disease [45], but not diabetic neuropathy measured by physical examinations [46]. Notably, microvascular complications were not predefined primary outcomes in these trials and small numbers of cases might partially explained the heterogeneities in these findings (e.g., 296 cases of very-high-risk chronic kidney disease in the Look AHEAD trial). Further trials with proper designs are needed to corroborate our findings in the future.

Our mediation analyses contribute to better understanding the lower risk of microvascular complications associated with lifestyle behaviors. Our data showed that the associations of overall lifestyle behaviors with diabetic kidney disease, diabetic neuropathy, and total microvascular complications may be explained by the improvement in glycemic control, liver function, lipid profile, and systemic inflammation, with lifestyle behaviors related lower risk of diabetic neuropathy might be additionally explained by kidney function amelioration. However, our data showed that the association between lifestyle and diabetic retinopathy was mainly through the glycemic control rather than other pathways. Our results corroborate prior findings from the observational studies. For example, intensive lifestyle intervention including physical activity and healthy diet recommendations could benefit glycemic control [47]. Adherence to a combined healthy lifestyle score including healthy diet, physically active, nonsmoking, healthy sleep, and social support were associated with lower concentrations of inflammatory markers [48]. Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study showed that combined healthy lifestyle characterized as physically active, nonsmoking, and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 were associated with lower risks of atherosclerotic events and kidney function decline among patients with chronic kidney disease [20]. Furthermore, lifestyle modifications including promoting healthy diet, physical activity, and weight loss could significantly improve liver function, renal function, lipid profile, endothelial dysfunction, and reduce systemic inflammation in interventional studies [4954].

The current study is among the first to investigate the relationship between the overall lifestyle behaviors and diabetic microvascular complications. The strengths of this study included the large sample size, long period of follow-up, and extensive collection of data on clinical biomarkers, which allowed us to comprehensively evaluate the potential mechanisms underlying the observed associations. Despite the strengths, this study should be interpreted in the light of its potential limitations. First, as the microvascular complications were identified via hospital inpatient records and death registries, there might be underreporting of the cases, for example, primary care data were not completely available currently. Second, the self-reported and one-time assessment of lifestyle behaviors data are susceptible to measurement errors. In addition, information on lifestyle behaviors was collected at recruitment and the behaviors may change over time; hence, the observed associations might be attenuated due to nondifferential misclassification bias. Third, mediation analysis assumes causality between lifestyles behaviors and biological biomarkers, although both the lifestyle behaviors and biological mediators were assessed at the same time in the UK Biobank. Future studies with repeatedly measured data are required to replicate our findings. Fourth, our study is limited in terms of ethnic diversity (>85{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} Whites); our results may not be directly generalized to other ethnic groups. Fifth, our study was based on a retrospective sampling from the UK Biobank study; hence, the causality should be interpreted with caution. Sixth, the UK Biobank is not representative of the general population of the UK, particularly relating to socioeconomic deprivation, lifestyles, and noncommunicable disease, with evidence of the healthy volunteer selection bias. Finally, residual or unknown confounding could not be excluded due to the observational study design, although we have in our effort to adjust for the potential confounding factors.

Supporting information

References

  1. 1.
    IDF. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. 10th edition. Brussels; 2021.
  2. 2.
    Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017;389(10085):2239–51. Epub 2017/02/14. pmid:28190580.
  3. 3.
    DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Groop L, Henry RR, Herman WH, Holst JJ, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15019. Epub 2015/01/01. pmid:27189025.
  4. 4.
    Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou CF, Cotch MF, Cheng YJ, Geiss LS, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005–2008. JAMA. 2010;304(6):649–56. Epub 2010/08/12. pmid:20699456; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2945293.
  5. 5.
    Parving HH, Lewis JB, Ravid M, Remuzzi G, Hunsicker LG. Prevalence and risk factors for microalbuminuria in a referred cohort of type II diabetic patients: a global perspective. Kidney Int. 2006;69(11):2057–63. Epub 2006/04/14. pmid:16612330.
  6. 6.
    Schmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(6):350–4. Epub 2002/11/21. pmid:12441828.
  7. 7.
    5. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S46–s60. Epub 2018/12/19. pmid:30559231.
  8. 8.
    Tracey ML, McHugh SM, Fitzgerald AP, Buckley CM, Canavan RJ, Kearney PM. Risk Factors for Macro- and Microvascular Complications among Older Adults with Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:5975903. Epub 2016/06/14. pmid:27294152; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4884580.
  9. 9.
    Dunkler D, Kohl M, Teo KK, Heinze G, Dehghan M, Clase CM, et al. Dietary risk factors for incidence or progression of chronic kidney disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes in the European Union. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30 Suppl 4:iv76–85. Epub 2015/07/26. pmid:26209742.
  10. 10.
    Blomster JI, Chow CK, Zoungas S, Woodward M, Patel A, Poulter NR, et al. The influence of physical activity on vascular complications and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(11):1008–12. Epub 2013/05/17. pmid:23675676.
  11. 11.
    Blomster JI, Zoungas S, Chalmers J, Li Q, Chow CK, Woodward M, et al. The relationship between alcohol consumption and vascular complications and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1353–9. Epub 2014/03/01. pmid:24578358.
  12. 12.
    Dunkler D, Kohl M, Heinze G, Teo KK, Rosengren A, Pogue J, et al. Modifiable lifestyle and social factors affect chronic kidney disease in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int. 2015;87(4):784–91. Epub 2014/12/11. pmid:25493953.
  13. 13.
    Man RE, Sabanayagam C, Chiang PP, Li LJ, Noonan JE, Wang JJ, et al. Differential Association of Generalized and Abdominal Obesity With Diabetic Retinopathy in Asian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(3):251–7. Epub 2016/01/01. pmid:26720805.
  14. 14.
    Geng TT, Jafar TH, Yuan JM, Koh WP. The impact of diabetes on the association between alcohol intake and the risk of end-stage kidney disease in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. J Diabetes. 2020;12(8):583–93. Epub 2020/03/07. pmid:32142209.
  15. 15.
    Nivukoski U, Niemelä M, Bloigu A, Bloigu R, Aalto M, Laatikainen T, et al. Impacts of unfavourable lifestyle factors on biomarkers of liver function, inflammation and lipid status. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0218463. Epub 2019/06/21. pmid:31220128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6586311.
  16. 16.
    Shi N, Aroke D, Jin Q, Lee DH, Hussan H, Zhang X, et al. Proinflammatory and Hyperinsulinemic Dietary Patterns Are Associated With Specific Profiles of Biomarkers Predictive of Chronic Inflammation, Glucose-Insulin Dysregulation, and Dyslipidemia in Postmenopausal Women. Front Nutr. 2021;8:690428. Epub 2021/10/08. pmid:34616762; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8488136.
  17. 17.
    Nivukoski U, Niemelä M, Bloigu A, Bloigu R, Aalto M, Laatikainen T, et al. Combined effects of lifestyle risk factors on fatty liver index. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20(1):109. Epub 2020/04/16. pmid:32293287; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7157978.
  18. 18.
    Paramastri R, Hsu CY, Chuang YK, Lee HA, Wiratama BS, Chao JC. Synergistic Interaction of Dietary Pattern and Concordance Lifestyle with Abnormal Liver Function among Young Adults in Taiwan: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study. Nutrients. 2021;13(10). Epub 2021/10/24. pmid:34684598; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8539530.
  19. 19.
    Geng TT, Talaei M, Jafar TH, Yuan JM, Koh WP. Pulse Pressure and the Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease Among Chinese Adults in Singapore: The Singapore Chinese Health Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(23):e013282. Epub 2019/11/27. pmid:31766974; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6912960.
  20. 20.
    Ricardo AC, Anderson CA, Yang W, Zhang X, Fischer MJ, Dember LM, et al. Healthy lifestyle and risk of kidney disease progression, atherosclerotic events, and death in CKD: findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(3):412–24. Epub 2014/12/03. pmid:25458663; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4339665.
  21. 21.
    Geng TT, Jafar TH, Neelakantan N, Yuan JM, van Dam RM, Koh WP. Healthful dietary patterns and risk of end-stage kidney disease: the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(3):675–83. Epub 2021/01/01. pmid:33381807; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7948892.
  22. 22.
    Niu M, Zhang L, Wang Y, Tu R, Liu X, Wang C, et al. Lifestyle Score and Genetic Factors With Hypertension and Blood Pressure Among Adults in Rural China. Front Public Health. 2021;9:687174. Epub 2021/09/07. pmid:34485217; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8416040.
  23. 23.
    Tu Z-Z, Lu Q, Zhang Y-B, Shu Z, Lai Y-W, Ma M-N, et al. Associations of Combined Healthy Lifestyle Factors with Risks of Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Mortality Among Adults with Prediabetes: Four Prospective Cohort Studies in China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Engineering. 2022.
  24. 24.
    Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779. Epub 2015/04/01. pmid:25826379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4380465.
  25. 25.
    Caleyachetty R, Littlejohns T, Lacey B, Bešević J, Conroy M, Collins R, et al. United Kingdom Biobank (UK Biobank): JACC Focus Seminar 6/8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(1):56–65. Epub 2021/07/03. pmid:34210415.
  26. 26.
    Vetter C, Dashti HS, Lane JM, Anderson SG, Schernhammer ES, Rutter MK, et al. Night Shift Work, Genetic Risk, and Type 2 Diabetes in the UK Biobank. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(4):762–9. Epub 2018/02/15. pmid:29440150; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5860836.
  27. 27.
    Carnethon MR, De Chavez PJ, Biggs ML, Lewis CE, Pankow JS, Bertoni AG, et al. Association of weight status with mortality in adults with incident diabetes. JAMA. 2012;308(6):581–90. Epub 2012/08/09. pmid:22871870; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3467944.
  28. 28.
    Tobias DK, Pan A, Jackson CL, O’Reilly EJ, Ding EL, Willett WC, et al. Body-mass index and mortality among adults with incident type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):233–44. Epub 2014/01/17. pmid:24428469; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3966911.
  29. 29.
    Dallongeville J, Bhatt DL, Steg PH, Ravaud P, Wilson PW, Eagle KA, et al. Relation between body mass index, waist circumference, and cardiovascular outcomes in 19,579 diabetic patients with established vascular disease: the REACH Registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(2):241–9. Epub 2011/04/01. pmid:21450609.
  30. 30.
    WHO. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation. Geneva; 2008.
  31. 31.
    IDF. Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. Brussel; 2020.
  32. 32.
    Chudasama YV, Khunti K, Gillies CL, Dhalwani NN, Davies MJ, Yates T, et al. Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy in people with multimorbidity in the UK Biobank: A longitudinal cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(9):e1003332. Epub 2020/09/23. pmid:32960883; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7508366.
  33. 33.
    Chudasama YV, Khunti KK, Zaccardi F, Rowlands AV, Yates T, Gillies CL, et al. Physical activity, multimorbidity, and life expectancy: a UK Biobank longitudinal study. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):108. Epub 2019/06/13. pmid:31186007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6560907.
  34. 34.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498–504. Epub 2000/09/19. pmid:10993420.
  35. 35.
    Said MA, Verweij N, van der Harst P. Associations of Combined Genetic and Lifestyle Risks With Incident Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in the UK Biobank Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(8):693–702. Epub 2018/06/30. pmid:29955826; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6143077.
  36. 36.
    Biobank UK. UK Biobank Biomarker Project—Companion Document to Accompany Serum Biomarker Data. UK Biobank Showcase. 2019;1(2019):2019.
  37. 37.
    Bonaccio M, Costanzo S, Di Castelnuovo A, Persichillo M, Magnacca S, De Curtis A, et al. Ultra-processed food intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in individuals with cardiovascular disease: the Moli-sani Study. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(3):213–24. Epub 2021/12/02. pmid:34849691.
  38. 38.
    Figueras-Roca M, Molins B, Sala-Puigdollers A, Matas J, Vinagre I, Ríos J, et al. Peripheral blood metabolic and inflammatory factors as biomarkers to ocular findings in diabetic macular edema. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0173865. Epub 2017/03/23. pmid:28328965; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5362077.
  39. 39.
    Saito H, Tanabe H, Kudo A, Machii N, Higa M, Yamaguchi S, et al. High FIB4 index is an independent risk factor of diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11753. Epub 2021/06/05. pmid:34083571; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8175689.
  40. 40.
    Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Pirruccello JP, Natarajan P, Vaduganathan M. Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes Across the Glycemic Spectrum: Insights From the UK Biobank. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(5):453–64. Epub 2021/05/21. pmid:34015477; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8324525.
  41. 41.
    Man REK, Gan ATL, Fenwick EK, Gupta P, Wong MYZ, Wong TY, et al. The Relationship between Generalized and Abdominal Obesity with Diabetic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Multiethnic Asian Study and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10(11). Epub 2018/11/08. pmid:30400648; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6266073.
  42. 42.
    Andersen ST, Witte DR, Dalsgaard EM, Andersen H, Nawroth P, Fleming T, et al. Risk Factors for Incident Diabetic Polyneuropathy in a Cohort With Screen-Detected Type 2 Diabetes Followed for 13 Years: ADDITION-Denmark. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):1068–75. Epub 2018/03/01. pmid:29487078.
  43. 43.
    Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(5):383–93. Epub 2003/01/31. pmid:12556541.
  44. 44.
    Gong Q, Gregg EW, Wang J, An Y, Zhang P, Yang W, et al. Long-term effects of a randomised trial of a 6-year lifestyle intervention in impaired glucose tolerance on diabetes-related microvascular complications: the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study. Diabetologia. 2011;54(2):300–7. Epub 2010/11/04. pmid:21046360.
  45. 45.
    Effect of a long-term behavioural weight loss intervention on nephropathy in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of the Look AHEAD randomised clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(10):801–9. Epub 2014/08/16. pmid:25127483; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4443484.
  46. 46.
    Effects of a long-term lifestyle modification programme on peripheral neuropathy in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD study. Diabetologia. 2017;60(6):980–8. Epub 2017/03/30. pmid:28349174; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5423967.
  47. 47.
    Johansen MY, MacDonald CS, Hansen KB, Karstoft K, Christensen R, Pedersen M, et al. Effect of an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318(7):637–46. Epub 2017/08/16. pmid:28810024.
  48. 48.
    Sotos-Prieto M, Bhupathiraju SN, Falcon LM, Gao X, Tucker KL, Mattei J. Association between a Healthy Lifestyle Score and inflammatory markers among Puerto Rican adults. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26(3):178–84. Epub 2016/02/04. pmid:26838054; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4788524.
  49. 49.
    Goodpaster BH, Delany JP, Otto AD, Kuller L, Vockley J, South-Paul JE, et al. Effects of diet and physical activity interventions on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk factors in severely obese adults: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2010;304(16):1795–802. Epub 2010/10/12. pmid:20935337; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3082279.
  50. 50.
    Estruch R, Martínez-González MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Covas MI, et al. Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(1):1–11. Epub 2006/07/05. pmid:16818923.
  51. 51.
    Esposito K, Marfella R, Ciotola M, Di Palo C, Giugliano F, Giugliano G, et al. Effect of a mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(12):1440–6. Epub 2004/09/24. pmid:15383514.
  52. 52.
    Schrauben SJ, Hsu JY, Amaral S, Anderson AH, Feldman HI, Dember LM. Effect of Kidney Function on Relationships between Lifestyle Behaviors and Mortality or Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Pooled Cohort Analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(3):663–75. Epub 2021/02/07. pmid:33547215; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7920187.
  53. 53.
    King CC, Piper ME, Gepner AD, Fiore MC, Baker TB, Stein JH. Longitudinal Impact of Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Inflammatory Markers of Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(2):374–9. Epub 2016/12/10. pmid:27932354; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5269476.
  54. 54.
    Franco I, Bianco A, Mirizzi A, Campanella A, Bonfiglio C, Sorino P, et al. Physical Activity and Low Glycemic Index Mediterranean Diet: Main and Modification Effects on NAFLD Score. Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Nutrients. 2020;13(1). Epub 2021/01/01. pmid:33379253; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7823843.

Effect of using 5A’s model for lifestyle counseling on psychological symptoms in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized field trial

Effect of using 5A’s model for lifestyle counseling on psychological symptoms in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized field trial
  • Alur-Gupta, S. et al. Body image distress is increased in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and mediates depression and anxiety. Fertil. Steril. 112(5), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.018 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tay, C. T., Teede, H. J., Hill, B., Loxton, D. & Joham, A. E. Increased prevalence of eating disorders, low self-esteem, and psychological distress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A community-based cohort study. Fertil. Steril. 112(2), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.027 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glowinska, A. et al. disparate relationship of sexual satisfaction, self-esteem, anxiety, and depression with endocrine profiles of women with or without PCOS. Reprod. Sci. 27(1), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00061-0 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yin, X. C., Ji, Y. N., Chan, C. L. W. & Chan, C. H. Y. The mental health of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Womens Ment. Health. 24(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01043-x (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rimmer, M., Tan, B. K., Teede, H., Thangaratinam, S. & Al Wattar, B. H. Metabolic inflexibility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 36, 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1698025 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giallauria, F. et al. Cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 9(10), 987–992 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weiss, J. & Kupker, W. Obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, cancer. Gynakol. Endokrinol. 15(2), 116–120 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Naz, M. S. G., Tehrani, F. R. & Ozgoli, G. Polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents: a qualitative study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 12, 715–723. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S207727.eCollection (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pena, A. S. et al. Adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome according to the international evidence-based guideline. BMC Med. 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01516-x (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teede, H. J. et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 33(9), 1602–1618. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey256 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Porchia, L. M., Hernandez-Garcia, S. C., Gonzalez-Mejia, M. E. & Lopez-Bayghen, E. Diets with lower carbohydrate concentrations improve insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Bio. 248, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.010 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patel, V. et al. Regular mindful yoga practice as a method to improve androgen levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Osteopath. Asso. 120(5), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.050 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munt, A. E., Partridge, S. R. & Allman-Farinelli, M. The barriers and enablers of healthy eating among young adults: A missing piece of the obesity puzzle: A scoping review. Obesity Rev. 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12472 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rzonca, E. et al. Generalized self-efficacy, dispositional optimism, and illness acceptance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 15(11), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112484 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Harwood, K., Vuguin, P. & DiMartino-Nardi, J. Current approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome in youth. Horm. Res. 68, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1159/000101538 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright, P. J., Dawson, R. M. & Corbett, C. F. Social construction of biopsychosocial and medical experiences of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Adv. Nurs. 76(7), 1728–1736. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14371 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scaruffi, E. et al. Body image, personality profiles and alexithymia in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). J. Psychosom. Obst. Gyn. 40(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2018.1530210 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weiss, T. R. & Bulmer, S. M. Young women’s experiences living with polycystic ovary syndrome. Jognn J. Obst. Gyn. Neo. 40(6), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01299.x (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ekramzadeh, M., Hajivandi, L., Noroozi, M. & Mostafavi, F. Psychological experiences of adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome: A qualitative study. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 25(4), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_276_19 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mani, H. et al. Structured education programme for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomised controlled trial. Endocr. Connect. 7(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0274 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rocha, A. L. et al. Recent advances in the understanding and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Research https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15318.1 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kazemi, M. et al. A randomized controlled trial of a lifestyle intervention with longitudinal follow-up on ovarian dysmorphology in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol. 92(6), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14179 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carolo, A. L. et al. Nutritional counseling promotes changes in the dietary habits of overweight and obese adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 39(12), 692–696. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607458 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooney, L. G. et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy improves weight loss and quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Fertil. Steril. 110(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.028 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ko, H., Teede, H. & Moran, L. Analysis of the barriers and enablers to implementing lifestyle management practices for women with PCOS in Singapore. BMC. Res. Notes 9, 311. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2107-2 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fitzpatrick, S. L. et al. An evidence-based guide for obesity treatment in primary care. Am. J. M. Sc. 129(1), 115.e1-115.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.07.015 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Asselin, J. et al. Impact of the 5As team study on clinical practice in primary care obesity management: A qualitative study. CMAJ 5(2), E322–E329. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20160090 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mateo, K. F. et al. Development of a 5As-based technology-assisted weight management intervention for veterans in primary care. BMC Health Serv. Res. 18(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2834-2 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lizneva, D. et al. Criteria, prevalence, and phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 106(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.003 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martinez-Pampliega, A., Herrero-Fernandez, D., Martin, S. & Cormenzana, S. Psychometrics of the SCL-90-R and development and testing of brief versions SCL-45 and SCL-9 in infertile couples. Nurs. Res. 68(4), E1–E10. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000363 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jakobsen, N. S., Kaufmann, L., Hennesser, Y. & Kristensen, S. T. A new approach for the dietitian that strengthens the relationship and collaboration with clients. Top. Clin. Nutr. 32(3), 229–242 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Drisko, J. & J.,. Active collaboration with clients: An underemphasized but vital part of evidence-based practice. Soc. Work. 62(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx003 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hasan, M. et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors for mental health problems among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 17(6), e0270102 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, A. W., Dollahite, J. S., Sobal, J. & Lujan, M. E. Health-related knowledge, beliefs and self-efficacy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 33(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex351 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brennan, L. et al. Lifestyle and behavioral management of polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Women’s Health. 26(8), 836–848. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5792 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kozica, S. L., Gibson-Helm, M. E., Teede, H. J. & Moran, L. J. Assessing self-efficacy and self-help methods in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. Ann. Behav. Med. 39(3), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2012.720312 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodriguez-Paris, D. et al. Psychiatric disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Psychiatr. Pol. 53(4), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/93105 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Starline Elementary School third quarter honor roll | Lifestyle

    Starline Elementary School third quarter honor roll | Lifestyle

    1st Grade:

    Principal’s Honor Roll: Gilbert Fallon, Molly Fibrow, Kyara Florentino, Jake Forster, Vanna Foster, Joseph Giles, Halle Hymas, Paisley Jacobs, Ivan Kreutzer, Kenzie Kukuk, Kanan Latimer, Karissa Leway, Joshua Lobb, Serena Lonial, Mackenzie Moffit, Liam Phillips, Justin Pulaski, Braden Ramirez, Brodie Ramirez, Harvey Shamos, Jaxton Sitzer, Wyatt Soper, Audrey Viera

    Honor Roll: Kaleo Baker-West, Zoey Bengard, Mia Castro, Sophia Clark, Presley Cordova, Hailey Cox,Emersyn Crane, Delilah Davis, Xzavier Dubon, Jazmyn Garcia, Paxton Ibarra, Peyton Mosley Romeo Murrillo, Andrew Murray, Matthew Palmer, Dominic Petracco, Sawyer Rohn, Kylee Smith, Payton Smith, Mason Vargas

    Next Grade:

    Principal’s Honor Roll: Emmie Atkins, Chami Awad, Kadey Batista, Andrea Buttke, Carissa Buttke, Livia Chapin, Behr Cochran, Zoey Foster, Anthony Kempenich, Isaac Leivas, Konner Leway, Gizelle Lopez, Henrie (Hank) Mills, Gunner Nelson, Grayson Nutt, Aiden Owens, Ronin Premaratne, Sprint Stepp, Charlotte Thompson, Deanna Partitions, Tatum Whitney, Troy Whittaker, Levi Wilson, Michael Zettel

    Honor Roll: Joseph (Lou) Atkinson, Jase Bailey, James Bauer, Alexander Boyd, Gannon Crampton, Hunter Dockery, Cooper Eagle, Brayden Ellingson, Spencer Gibson, Keaton Harbour, Trinity Hart, Genevieve Janik, Jaylen Jimenez, Isamely Lemus Gonzalez, Derrick Kowaleski, Henry Morin, Mayson Ossman, Evan Pulaski, Collin Quinn, Teagan Randal, John Ronningen, Sara Sidiqi, Lily Salido, Hunter Scholz, Boston Simon, Audrina Slater, Teagan Sutphen, Payton Taylor, Olivia Thomas, Eli Turner, Musa Umar, Bristol Van Tassel, Celia Villegas Godinez, Valen Waddell, Isabelle Wincell, Ayva Yacovelli, Jamison Zielinski

    3rd Quality:

    Principal’s Honor Roll:

    Sophia Anderson, Rylee Bedford, Jacquleen Broderick, James Cross, Bobbi Delira, Tessa Felish, Kylie Franklin, Alma Gilbert, Parker Hall, Bently Hill, Ashlee Hubbard, Tucker Ibarra, Wyatt Lauer, Morgan Moffit, Oliver Nazarian, Charles O’hara lll, Anderson Olson, Chase Phillips, Jianni Rueda, Jade Saari, Dalilah Sage, Elicia Sanchez, Emran Sidiqi, Luke Velasco, Javier Viscaino, Brayden Washington, Cade Williams, Maverick Willis, Makenzie Wilson

    Honor Roll: Charlie Aguilar, Avery Anderson, Riley Bacon, Dianna Bailon-Marquez, Colton Buchholz, Julian Cipriani, Anna Crook, Bryan Dorantes Dominguez, Allison Fockaert, Allison Fromang, John Gereghty, Shane Gonzales, Jackson Gray, Rain Hawkins, Eli Hernandez, Jax Huljev, Edgar Juarez Jr., Kaden King, Logan Lauer, Julian Martin-Acosta, Bryton McFarland, Corbin McShea, Leonardo Quintana, Rocco Romo, Kaylee Ross, Lawrence Schott, Leland Smith, Lukas Starling, Elizabeth Syhlowy, Mason Timbrel, Mary-Elizabeth Wilhelm, Mark Wysocki

    Fourth Quality:

    Principal’s Honor Roll: Evan Atkins, Maxwell Barba, Bryson Bullock, Vivian Cole, Maggie Cross, Isabella Ewing, Presley Felish, Irelynn Ferguson, Kaye Florentino, Shelby French, Sophie Giles, Orion Hengerer, Lillee Licher, Camryn Lockman, Addyson Lyons, Noemi Martinez, Carter Nevarez, Lielah Nutt, Wren Sautner, Otto Surprenant, Kaidyn Tullous, Kylee Vu, Alaina Waller, Ryder Wilson, Vanessa Wincell, Bryson Zadra

    Honor Roll: Kyle Abal, Shianne Abal, Jordyn Amador, Madilyn Baldwin, Kaydence Behrendt, Garrett Bell, Antonio Biasiucci, Stella Cardone, Siena Corry, Khloe Dale, Lily Gibbons, Axel Gonzalez-Reyes, Violet Hendershot, Aria Holl, Kashton Hook, Miles Jarrell, Jameson King, Jaycee Lang, Sebastian Martin, Trevor Millard, Ross Molyneux, Kaden Osgood, Mackenzie Palmer, Bao Extended Phan, Lyla Porter, Mark Queen, Laila Ruane-Leonard, Yusuf Sidiqi, Kennedy Sitterley, Christopher Szymanski, Devin Walls, Tatum Weaver, Aspen Zickefoose

    FIFTH Grade:

    Principal’s Honor Roll: Karim Atassi, Charli Baskette, Brooke Bedford, Anna Bengard, Bliss Fiala, Emmett Gilbert, Addison Corridor, Presley Hopkins, Raiden Hoy, Zara Issa, Aidan Jacobson, Sofia Lonial, Kadance Lemus, Alice Mills, Will Nobel, Jayde Pedersen, Ryder Phillips, Montana Simon, Boston Stepp, Hannah Vu, Camden Wilson,

    Honor Roll: Addison Alba, Lacey Most effective, Andie Collamer, Demetry Coloscos, Mason Connelly, Anberlin Ebert, Marleigh Elizondo, Brody Frisby, Corey Girton, Skyler Improve, Isabell Hernandez, Brody Harm, Ka’eo Kalauli, Macie Kimball, Eli Leivas, Lily Lytle, Lelia Mayson, Israel McInerney, Deegan McShea, Anastasia Milligan, Thomas Milligan, Gacie Nelson, Madison Pope, Kellan Portz, Payton Reeves, Baylee Riggenbach, Jennifer Roger, James Rogers, Chaiselyn Rohn, Aubree Rounds, Becca Salter, Leeland Sanders, Sparrow Shuffler, Trent Sievert, Piper Willis

    SIXTH Quality:

    Principal’s Honor Roll: Lily Arias, Paula Bailon, Brylie Ideal, Jovanna Chavarin, Sarah Clark, Maddox Cosentino, Jay Deacon, Casey Lang, Caleb Lloyd, Ryan Norris, Corbin Owens, Aubrey Quintanilla, Cohen Riddle, Makenna Roger, Nathan Roncevich

    Honor Roll: Alexa Adamo, Yaritza Alvarado, Kiera Alvarado Pena, James Atkinson, Corey Bacon, Dominic Bailey, Audra Bekkedahl, Max Bennetch, Parker Chavez, David Christian, Travis Dennen, James Ellsberry, Aubrey Franklin, Audrey French, Cole Environmentally friendly, Brooklyn Hill, Grace Jackson, Jaylah Jimenez, Aobakwe Kesitilwe, James Kroll, Tayo Lam, Raiden Very little, Genevieve Lytle, Katie Lytle, Logan MacLaurin, Kirk Miller, Emely Navarro, Reese Olson, Erik Ortega, Kendall Queen, Payton Randall, Ryder Rickard, Austin Rounds, Christopher Saracho, Alivia Sartin, Paisley Sartin, Cira Mae Sautner, Taylor Skelton, Julissa Thing Najera, Christopher Tullous, Charles Wilhelm, Melanie Zettel

    Special privilege in college admissions

    Special privilege in college admissions
    college student writer essay laptop business
    (© Viktoriia – stock.adobe.com)

    Whilst a big scandal erupted in 2019 more than bribery and other fraudulent practices utilised by rich People in america to secure their children’s admission to elite schools, the affluent continue on to profit from other types of particular admission insurance policies that are completely lawful, Alternative Medicine.

    Contemplate the reality that, in accordance to a latest examine, only about 57 per cent of Harvard’s white students were admitted on the foundation of academic merit. The other 43 {e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} received exclusive therapy because their mothers and fathers had manufactured big donations to Harvard, or they experienced mothers and fathers who had graduated from the college (“legacy admissions”) or taught there, or had been recruited as athletes. With out this preferential position, some three-quarters of them would have been rejected in the powerful competition for admission.

    Truly, a preferential status for the privileged has extensive been a custom in the major ranks of American increased instruction. During their initially many years, elite faculties regarded as only wealthy white college students as worthy of admission. Even by the conclusion of the nineteenth century, their campuses were populated mostly by graduates of non-public high universities. In the early twentieth century, worried directors, anxious to limit the quantity of Jews and other new immigrants, leaned significantly on legacy position, household donations, and athletic recruiting.

    I had a vague feeling of these priorities when, from 1958 to 1962, I was a scholar at Columbia School. Founded in 1754, this male undergraduate university offered the core of Columbia College, which grew up all over it. Composed of about 2,000 learners, the school was a section of the prestigious Ivy League, and the suitable, promoted by the administration, was “the nicely-rounded man.” This expression had a alternatively patrician, inbred ring to it, and surely didn’t describe me or most of my college or university close friends, who had attended city community educational institutions, came from modest economic instances, ended up devoid of athletic skills, and lacked household connections to the establishment.

    Even so, though a Columbia undergraduate, I discovered features that prompt a disturbing hierarchy in admissions. A ton of my classmates had attended fancy prep schools, and continue to other individuals ended up expert athletes who finished up as reasonably dim stars in the school’s lustrous intellectual firmament. Also, the vast the greater part of Columbia’s college students ended up white. My entering yearbook (The 1962 Listing), which shows pics of almost the complete freshman course, exhibits only five pupils who are clearly Black. At the time, higher education admissions apps necessary a photograph of the candidates, a helpful resource for screening out these deemed undesirable.

    Things commenced to transform a bit—though not much—in 1970, when I was teaching heritage at Vassar College. As one particular of the 7 Sister Colleges, Vassar experienced an elite standing similar to Columbia’s, and arrived within just a hairsbreadth of merging with Yale in the late 1960s. Even so, the civil legal rights movement, the Vietnam War, and the discovery of poverty shook it up, top to strain to shift further than Vassar’s traditionally white, economically relaxed (and occasionally rather wealthy) university student constituency and produce a far more numerous a single. As a final result, a committee was billed with developing new admissions conditions, and I was appointed to the committee.

    Immediately after many committee meetings, we at last agreed upon a simple affirmative action process. In the position of admission candidates from 1 (the ideal) to 5 (the worst), we would give customers of earlier excluded teams a furthermore, therefore giving them with an edge around some others in their rank. At this position, while, with about 15 minutes remaining in the previous assembly, the admissions director declared, instead casually, that the recommendations would, of course, continue on to give a moreover to kids of Vassar graduates! I instantly objected, pointing out that this would reproduce the outdated admissions sample. A Black college student who served on the committee agreed with me. But we had been outvoted, and traditional privileges prevailed.

    It really should occur as no surprise, then, that, even as affirmative motion has elevated the quantity of college students of coloration at America’s elite colleges, older patterns of favoritism have ongoing.

    This is especially correct when it arrives to the children of the abundant. Scientists have observed that the offspring of the prime 1 p.c are 77 occasions extra possible to attend an elite personal U.S. faculty than individuals from the base 20 percent. And this is no incident. At Harvard, prime administrators regularly bent the school’s admissions specifications to accommodate rich donors. Jared Kushner’s admission to Harvard, following a desultory tutorial general performance at his prep school, adopted upon his father’s offer of $2.5 million to the university. Of program, offered inflation and the extreme competitors for admission, the cost has risen more than the a long time. “You utilized to be equipped to sway an admissions business office for $1 million,” remarked Mark Sklarow, the chief government officer of the Independent Instructional Consultants Affiliation. “Now it is possibly $10 million and up.”

    Even though some elite faculties no longer give particular remedy to small children of their alumni, most of them go on this apply. As a consequence, “legacy” students—who tend to be affluent and white—constitute a sizeable constituency, including 14 {e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} of the freshman class at Yale, 13 {e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} at Dartmouth, and 10 percent at Brown. At Harvard, “legacy” applicants are six periods far more likely to be admitted than pupils without this hereditary privilege.

    Eventually, most elite schools carry on the exercise of prioritizing the admission of athletes. This priority, like other classic types, lowers tutorial benchmarks and—largely thanks to the point that quite a few Ivy League teams are located in higher-class sporting activities like sailing, golf, water polo, lacrosse, and fencing—contributes to the admission of massive numbers of white, affluent students. As a Harvard school member noted, the athletic preference is “blatantly privileging presently privileged groups.”

    In general, it is very clear that benefit-dependent admission at the nation’s greatest schools will not be secured while these kinds of priorities continue being in put.

    Dr. Lawrence Wittner, syndicated by PeaceVoice, is Professor of Heritage emeritus at SUNY/Albany and the writer of Confronting the Bomb (Stanford University Press).

    Visit : https://genealogyinternational.com/

    Note to policymakers: Home-schooling is here to stay | Lifestyle

    Note to policymakers: Home-schooling is here to stay | Lifestyle

    Homeschooling is here to stay and the time has come for policymakers to acknowledge that fact. After years of increasing at a rate of about 3 percent a year, the number of parents choosing to homeschool their children has spiked, triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the portion of children being homeschooled doubled from 5.4 percent during the 2019-20 school year to 11 percent in 2020-21. Among Black families, homeschooling jumped nearly five-fold during that time, from 3.3 percent to 16.1 percent.

    Even in Massachusetts, where only 1.5 percent of students were homeschooled before the pandemic, the number was up to 12.1 percent by the fall of 2020.

    And it’s no longer just for religious conservatives. There has been a big jump in “second choice” homeschoolers, who choose the option for more pragmatic reasons. With more parents working from home when the pandemic began, they had a bird’s-eye view of K-12 education in the age of COVID. Many didn’t like what they saw.

    It didn’t take an education degree for them to see that overall student progress was slowing – a fact that has since been borne out in state tests. It was equally clear to parents that online learning wasn’t working for one or more of their children.

    Many thought about homeschooling for the first time. Others who had previously considered it concluded that this was the time to give it a shot. Lest we forget, homeschooling IS “in-person” learning – one of the factors that public school authorities have insisted that parents were demanding.

    Another indication that homeschooling has grown beyond its fundamentalist roots is that about half of parents with more than one child in school don’t homeschool all of them. This not only suggests that parents can tell when online education is working and when it isn’t, but that their motivation is educational, not ideological.

    While the belief that learning at home is a safer environment than going to school was a motivator, especially for urban parents, having more say over their child’s education was the dominant reason for the increase in homeschooling.

    As for the idea that attending school is critical to a child’s socialization, homeschooling parents would counter that their choice doesn’t prohibit their children from participating in sports, cultural and other group activities, or even just hanging out with the neighborhood kids.

    Still, homeschooling will undoubtedly be a temporary solution for some. But the upward trend in families choosing to do it is sure to continue and likely to accelerate. Many parents had options for educational choices during the pandemic. But the increase in families opting for homeschooling was far more significant than that experienced by other options such as private/parochial, charter, vocational and virtual schools.

    Many in the educational establishment vehemently oppose homeschooling, but the fact is that it results in massive savings for traditional schools. If it were banned and the five million American students the Census Bureau estimates are being homeschooled is correct, it would cost $50 million-to-$75 million a year, or nearly $1 trillion over a student’s 13-year K-12 career.

    In addition, schools across the country would need 80,000 more teachers at an annual cost of $13 billion, and between 4,000 and 10,000 school buildings would have to be built.

    Homeschooling is legal in all 50 states, but each has its own regulations. Some are encouraging, but others make the homeschooling choice unduly difficult for families.

    Opposition from traditional education interest groups is one reason why homeschooling often gets the cold shoulder from government. But the time has come for policymakers to acknowledge it as a viable educational choice and do more to support those who are considering non-traditional options for their children’s education.

    That means school districts should provide information to parents seeking information about those options and include links on their websites to the homeschooling support groups that exist in every state.

    We are only beginning to appreciate the long-term impacts the pandemic has had on our way of life. In education, one of those impacts is accelerating the rise of homeschooling. It’s time for policymakers to catch up with the times.