Tag: performance

Posted on

Persistent association between family socioeconomic status and primary school performance in Britain over 95 years

Persistent association between family socioeconomic status and primary school performance in Britain over 95 years

  • Baker, D. P., Goesling, B. & Letendre, G. K. Socioeconomic Status, School Quality, and National Economic Development: A Cross−National Analysis of the “Heyneman ‐ Loxley Effect” on Mathematics and Science Achievement. Comp. Educ. Rev. 46, 291–312 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Heckman, J. J. Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children. Soc. Sci. 312, 1900–1902 (2006).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar     

  • Sirin, S. R. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Rev. Educ. Res. 75, 417–453 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Smith-Woolley, E. et al. Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. npj Sci. Learn. 3, 1–7 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Chmielewski, A. K. The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015. Am. Sociol. Rev. 84, 517–544 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Hanushek, E. A., Peterson, P. E., Talpey, L. M. & Woessmann, L. “The Unwavering SES Achievement Gap: Trends in US Student Performance”. NBER Working Paper No. 25648. (2019).

  • Reardon, S. F. The widening income achievement gap in Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances, G. J. Duncan, R. J. Murnane, Eds. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011), pp. 91–115.

  • Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Miiller, W. & Pollak, R. Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. Am. J. Soc. 114, 1475–1521 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Bradley, R. H. & Corwyn, R. F. Socioeconomic Status and Child Development. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 371–399 (2002).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar     

  • Brooks-Gunn, J. & Duncan, G. J. The effects of poverty on children. Futur. Child. 7, 55–71 (1997).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Jensen, S. K. G., Berens, A. E. & Nelson, C. A. Effects of poverty on interacting biological systems underlying child development. Lancet Child Adolesc. Heal. 1, 225–239 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L. & Duncan, B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. (New York: Seminar Press, 1972).

  • von Stumm, S., Deary, I. J. & Hagger-Johnson, G. Life-course pathways to psychological distress: A cohort study. BMJ Open 3, 1–10 (2013).


    Google Scholar     

  • Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C. Theory, culture & society. Reproduction in education, society and culture, 2nd Ed. (Sage Publications, Inc., 1990).

  • Coleman, J. S. Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Duncan, G. J. & Murnane, R. J. “Introduction: The American Dream, Then and Now” in Whither Opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances, G. J. Duncan, R. J. Murnane, Eds (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011), pp. 3–23.

  • Bernstein, B. Class, codes, and control. (London: Routledge., 1975).

  • Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, 1995).

  • Hoff, E. The Specificity of Environmental Influence: Socioeconomic Status Affects Early Vocabulary Development Via Maternal Speech. Child Dev. 74, 1368–1378 (2003).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar     

  • von Stumm, S., Rimfeld, K., Dale, P. S. & Plomin, R. Preschool Verbal and Nonverbal Ability Mediate the Association Between Socioeconomic Status and School Performance. Child Dev. 00, 1–10 (2020).


    Google Scholar     

  • Heath, S. B. Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

  • Lareau, A. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life (University of California Press, 2003).

  • Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K. & Huston, A. C. School Readiness and Later Achievement. Dev. Psychol. 43, 1428 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar     

  • von Stumm, S. & Plomin, R. Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy through adolescence. Intelligence 48, 30–36 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Duncan, G. J. & Magnuson, K. The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems in Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances, G. J. Duncan, R. J. Murnane, Eds (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011), pp. 47–69.

  • von Stumm, S. Socioeconomic status amplifies the achievement gap throughout compulsory education independent of intelligence. Intelligence 60, 57–62 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • von Stumm, S. et al. Predicting educational achievement from genomic measures and socioeconomic status. Dev. Sci. 23, 1–8 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Dumay, X., Coe, R. & Anumendem, D. N. Stability over time of different methods of estimating school performance. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 25, 64–82 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Ma, X. Stability of school academic performance across subject areas. J. Educ. Meas. 38, 1–18 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Schoon, I., Jones, E., Cheng, H. & Maughan, B. Family hardship, family instability, and cognitive development. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 66, 716–722 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar     

  • Dumont, H. & Ready, D. D. Do Schools Reduce or Exacerbate Inequality? How the Associations Between Student Achievement and Achievement Growth Influence Our Understanding of the Role of Schooling. Am. Educ. Res. J. 57, 728–774 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Machin, S. & Vignoles, A. “Education Policy in the UK.” (Centre for the Economics of Education: London School of Economics, 2006).

  • Stewart, K. & Obolenskaya, P. “The coalition’s record on the under fives: Policy, spending and outcomes 2010–2015”. Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion Working Paper No. 12. (2015).

  • Espinoza, O. Solving the equity-equality conceptual dilemma: A new model for analysis of the educational process. Educ. Res. 49, 343–363 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Sokolowski, H. M. & Ansari, D. Understanding the effects of education through the lens of biology. npj Sci. Learn. 3, 26–28 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Lupton, R. et al. The Coalition’s Social Policy Record: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 2010–2015 (Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion: London School of Economics, 2015).

  • Hanushek, E. A. & Wößmann, L. Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Econ. J. 116, 63–76 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G. & Mijs, J. J. B. Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 407–428 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Evans, D. & Over, M. The economic impact of Covid-19 in low-and middle-income countries. Cent. Glob. Dev. (2020).

  • Glei, D. A., Goldman, N. & Weinstein, M. A growing socioeconomic divide: Effects of the Great Recession on perceived economic distress in the United States. PLoS One 14, 1–24 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Ranciere, R. & Kumhof, M. M. “Inequality, leverage and crises”. International Monetary Foundation Working Paper No. 10/268. (2010).

  • Moya, M. & Fiske, S. T. The Social Psychology of the Great Recession and Social Class Divides. J. Soc. Issues 73, 8–22 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Belknap Press, 2017).

  • Park, H., Buchmann, C., Choi, J. & Merry, J. J. Learning Beyond the School Walls: Trends and Implications. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42, 231–252 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Aurini, J. & Davies, S. The Transformation of Private Tutoring: Education in a Franchise. Can. J. Sociol. Can. Sociol. 29, 419–438 (2004).


    Google Scholar     

  • Jung, J. H. & Lee, K. H. The determinants of private tutoring participation and attendant expenditures in Korea. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 11, 159–168 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Park, H., yong Byun, S. & keun Kim, K. Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea: Focusing on private tutoring. Sociol. Educ. 84, 3–22 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Boudon, R. Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974).

  • Gillard, D. (2009) Short and Fraught: the history of primary education in England. Available at: www.educationengland.org.uk/articles/28primary.html [Accessed May 12, 2020]

  • White, K. R. The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychol. Bull. 91, 461–481 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Cave, S. N. & von Stumm, S. Secondary data analysis of British population cohort studies: A practical guide for education researchers. Brit. J. EdPsych https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12386 (2020).

  • Bukodi, E., Bourne, M. & Betthäuser, B. Wastage of talent?: Social origins, cognitive ability and educational attainment in Britain. Adv. Life Course Res. 34, 34–42 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Sandel, M. J. The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? (Penguin Books, 2020).

  • Office of Educational Technology, “United States National Education Technology Plan” (2017).

  • Triventi, M., Skopek, J., Kulic, N., Buchholz, S. & Blossfeld, H. P. Advantage ‘Finds Its Way’: How Privileged Families Exploit Opportunities in Different Systems of Secondary Education. Sociology 54, 237–257 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

  • Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar     

    • Posted on

    Nvidia’s AI-powered scaling makes old games look better without a huge performance hit

    Nvidia’s newest sport-all set driver contains a device that could allow you make improvements to the picture good quality of games that your graphics card can very easily operate, together with optimizations for the new God of War Computer port. The tech is identified as Deep Mastering Dynamic Tremendous Resolution, or DLDSR, and Nvidia says you can use it to make “most games” glimpse sharper by jogging them at a greater resolution than your monitor natively supports.

    DLDSR builds on Nvidia’s Dynamic Super Resolution tech, which has been about for a long time. Basically, common aged DSR renders a activity at a bigger resolution than your check can tackle and then downscales it to your monitor’s indigenous resolution. This qualified prospects to an graphic with greater sharpness but generally arrives with a dip in efficiency (you are asking your GPU to do far more do the job, just after all). So, for instance, if you had a graphics card able of jogging a match at 4K but only had a 1440p check, you could use DSR to get a strengthen in clarity.

    DLDSR requires the identical principle and incorporates AI that can also get the job done to boost the graphic. According to Nvidia, this indicates you can upscale fewer (and thus lose significantly less general performance) while nevertheless finding very similar impression top quality enhancements. In authentic numbers, Nvidia statements you will get picture high quality similar to operating at 4 times the resolution utilizing DSR with only 2.25 situations the resolution with DLDSR. Nvidia offers an example utilizing 2017’s Prey: Electronic Deluxe functioning on a 1080p monitor: 4x DSR operates at 108 FPS, though 2.25x DLDSR is obtaining 143 FPS, only two frames per 2nd slower than jogging at indigenous 1080p.

    Of class, you may perhaps want to choose all those impressive outcomes with a grain of salt, as Nvidia’s certainly likely to want to present a single of the ideal-case illustrations. In the real globe, you may get various effects with various game titles, each in phrases of FPS and what options you have to operate DLDSR in to get it on the lookout crisp. Supplied its wider match guidance, however, you will possibly be equipped to enjoy all around with it applying just one of your beloved more mature titles — although you nevertheless will need to have an RTX card, and they are not accurately straightforward to get appropriate now.

    This is not the initially time Nvidia’s employed deep finding out to enhance impression excellent and performance — it’s gotten a great deal of praise for its Deep Mastering Super Sampling, or DLSS, technique. On the other hand, DLSS needs to be precisely supported by the activity, and the record of game titles you can use it with is relatively smaller (while, as of these days, it contains the God of War).

    AMD, Nvidia’s graphics card competitor, has also announced tech to enhance overall performance and graphics on a extensive array of game titles. It calls its tactic Radeon Super Resolution, and although it does not use exactly the exact same methods as DLSS or DLDSR (AMD has its individual upscaling tech termed virtual tremendous resolution), it is aiming in direction of the exact target.

    If you want to consider out Nvidia’s DLDSR, update to the most recent driver, then open up Nvidia Manage Panel application. Go to Handle 3D Settings, simply click the DSR – Elements fall-down, and decide on just one of the DL Scaling options.