Tag: REGULAR

Posted on

‘Regular and substantive interaction’ in online college

‘Regular and substantive interaction’ in online college

In 2017, the U.S. Office of Education’s Business office of Inspector Normal audited Western Governors University and labeled it a “correspondence education” supplier fairly than a “distance education” service provider.

Only on-line colleges that offer “regular and substantive interaction” involving college members and learners are viewed as length training companies individuals that drop short are in the enterprise of correspondence education and learning. The regulation is intended to reduce negative actors from gaining access to federal monetary assist cash for courses that are devoid of human conversation. The inspector basic located that just about two-thirds (62 percent) of Western Governors pupils in the 2014 audit sample took at least a person training course that failed to satisfy the length schooling prerequisites. That finding exceeded the government’s 50 percent restrict, prompting the federal government to tell Western Governors to reimburse $713 million in federal economical support funds.

Later on, in 2019, the Instruction Department’s Business office of Federal Scholar Help made a decision that Western Governors need not pay back, citing “the ambiguity of the legislation and rules and the deficiency of apparent advice accessible at the time of the audit interval.” That ambiguity has endured to this working day, even as the Schooling Division and colleges nationwide nudge each and every other toward much more clarity about what “regular and substantive interaction” in length schooling indicates.

“We need to have to be mindful about what we talk to for simply because we may possibly just get it,” reported Russell Poulin, government director at WCET and vice president for technologies-enhanced schooling at the Western Interstate Fee for Better Schooling, noting that they do want direction that is as crystal clear as achievable. The commission, which advocates for digital mastering in postsecondary education, analyzes, interprets and tries to offer examples of what Schooling Section policies could possibly glance like in exercise so that its member establishments remain in just the often-unwritten tips.

To be distinct, each the schools and the Training Office look to interact in this dialogue in superior religion. That is, they share a intention of defending students as people and making certain that federal fiscal help bucks are spent judiciously. But here’s the conundrum: If the Instruction Division presents as well substantially advice on what “regular and substantive interaction” implies, then colleges may well have issues designing and supplying artistic, high quality plans that meet the requirements of their exclusive student populations. At the very same time, if the Schooling Department gives way too little guidance, colleges may well operate afoul of unarticulated rules.

In 2018, via a negotiated rule-making system, the Trump administration sought to let more regulatory overall flexibility in length studying by defining “regular and substantive interaction” as conference the regular if it satisfied two of 5 disorders: “providing immediate instruction examining or supplying opinions on a student’s course perform delivering facts or responding to concerns about the content material of a program or competency facilitating a team dialogue pertaining to the articles of a class or competency or other tutorial functions authorized by the institution’s or program’s accrediting company.” But that regular drew criticism, particularly specified that the past criterion authorized establishments to determine “substantive” for themselves.

Very last year, Kathryn Kerensky, WCET’s digital learning, coverage and compliance director, wrote to the Instruction Department asking added, specific concerns about the definition of “regular and substantive interaction” in distance instruction. The interaction was one in a collection of requests in recent decades that have sought to tease out the this means of “regular and substantive conversation.” Of be aware is a 2016 WCET website submit, co-authored by Poulin, that provides a noteworthy total of interpretation on the Instruction Department’s incomplete direction on “regular and substantive interaction” in on the web studying, contributing to its status as the most read put up on the web site, according to Poulin.

The Schooling Department replied to Kerensky’s latest queries in a letter dated in March. (The letter was “delayed in transit,” as Kerensky been given it in October.) As has been the scenario in this modern-day-day saga, the letter shipped the two new insight and unanswered inquiries.

New Advice on ‘Regular and Substantive’

The Instruction Department’s 2022 letter to WCET offered some new steering on what “regular and substantive interaction” in length instruction usually means. Exclusively, direct instruction indicates “live synchronous instruction the place both the instructor and the student are online and in conversation at the same time.”

“That clarity was really practical,” Poulin mentioned, noting that member institutions had experienced distinctive interpretations, including some that considered asynchronous video lectures as direct instruction. Asynchronous videos can however be a worth-extra part of a training course, Poulin noted, but they can’t “count” as portion of direct instruction.

Scheduled place of work several hours “can fulfill section of the necessity for normal interaction between instructors and college students,” according to the letter. That much too was valuable, as some WCET member establishments had claimed that some in the economic support community disagreed with this interpretation.

Also, the Training Department affirmed that it defers to accreditors relating to instructor skills essential for delivering “substantive conversation.” To date, schools have been unclear, for example, whether instructing assistants, graduate students or group instruction may well rely towards this necessity. In the 2017 circumstance versus Western Governors, the government cited concerns about insufficient college roles in the institution’s length education and learning programs. (The competency-dependent university has an unusual college design that has many men and women carrying out traditional educational roles.) Nevertheless the Training Department’s letter did not settle this subject, it pointed to in which schools could come across the response, which Poulin famous was a “very helpful” development in Schooling Department responses in recent years.

Lingering Queries About ’Regular and Substantive’

Some colleges have been unclear about the diploma to which instructors need to have interaction in on the net group conversations in purchase for an exercise to depend as normal and substantive conversation. For example, a person establishment reported that some online school customers designed styles of initiating discussions and returned to the dialogue only at the finish to grade them, in accordance to the Training Department’s letter. On the dilemma of instructor engagement, the Training Division strategies to answer on a scenario-by-circumstance foundation.

“What is the evidence that an establishment could present to demonstrate this?” Poulin questioned, noting that college administrators might, for case in point, coordinate endeavours with campus models that can attract data from discovering administration programs. “It would have been pleasant to see a couple of examples.”

“With compliance, you want to have these black-and-white specifications,” Kerensky claimed. “It’s hard for institutions to not have the very clear solutions. But the downside of obtaining very prescriptive requirements is that there’s not the home to create outdoors of that. We take pleasure in their viewpoint in leaving some things open up.”

Some colleges sought guidance on the variety of proof that could show that faculty substantively interact with learners, especially as the Education and learning Division experienced before mentioned that institutions need not “document the actual quantity of time used on any distinct kind of substantive conversation.” In this most modern letter, the Instruction Section affirmed previously steerage that establishments should sustain insurance policies or treatments that “create anticipations for college to substantively interact with pupils,” but it declined to comment even further about how institutions could put into action and enforce these guidelines.

WCET’s member establishments also sought the department’s guidance on how system style may exhibit that interactions involving instructors and pupils had been “prompt and proactive,” as demanded by the regulations. Before, the department experienced famous that establishments are not essential to document “each and every” conversation. But in the most modern communication, the agency declined to give criteria, these as guidelines or metrics, for determining no matter if interactions are prompt and proactive. In its place, the Training Section mentioned that it would be produced on a case-by-situation foundation.

When school directors and faculty members are unclear about how to comply with the Education Department’s regulations, they would be wise to have defensible procedures, Kerensky said. That is, a college’s plan for supporting frequent and substantive conversation need to be clear and ought to articulate a procedure for guaranteeing that the policy is enforced. Also, directors and school ought to be capable to argue why the coverage and techniques are what they are. That way, really should an audited institution be cited for a violation, their protection will be completely ready.

This bureaucratic dance involving the Instruction Office and online faculties may be imperfect, but neither celebration seems motivated to improve the position quo on how they negotiate length instruction needs.

“We’re striving to press the office to be as apparent as it can be but also be mindful about what we request for,” Poulin reported, pausing a defeat just before reiterating, “we do not want to push them as well much.”

Posted on

Four things worth noting as Thorns transition from Challenge Cup to NWSL regular season

Four things worth noting as Thorns transition from Challenge Cup to NWSL regular season

Portland’s 2022 Problem Cup run arrived to an end in southern California past weekend. The Thorns picked up three wins, a attract and two defeats as a result of 6 online games, but it wasn’t more than enough to make the tournament’s semifinal.

Ahead Sophia Smith led the Thorns’ assault with three aims scored in excess of the class of the tournament when newly signed midfielder Hina Sugita netted a brace in the team’s 3-2 acquire over San Diego. Defensively, Portland kept two clear sheets and allowed just five aims as a result of six games.

“The Problem Cup is a hard match, but it is fantastic for a good deal of various factors,” defender Meghan Klingenberg said. “We’re acquiring some good quality matches against good quality opponents, and that prepares you for the normal year.”

Although there were a number of isolated positives, the Problem Cup served as a very important early mastering expertise that will reward the workforce going forward. Nevertheless modifying to a new head mentor in Rhian Wilkinson, the Thorns now have six competitive video games worthy of of film and expertise to overview and understand from.

Prior to turning the webpage to the regular period – which begins at residence in opposition to the Kansas Metropolis Present on Saturday (3pm PT, TICKETS, Twitch) – it is important to very first reflect on the previous thirty day period of game titles. From learning how to increase into game titles to experimentation with formations and lineups, these are a couple of issues to note from this year’s iteration of the Problem Cup.

The Sophia Smith influence

When she only played 5 game titles during the Obstacle Cup, it can be presently crystal clear that Smith is going to give several opponents head aches this period.

Drafted No. 1 in general in the 2020 NWSL Draft, the previous Stanford Cardinal scored seven goals in 2021. If early returns are any indicator, Smith is on speed for a number of a lot more in 2022.

Resourceful, blazing fast and eager to operate at any defender, Smith’s potential to be consistently perilous when on the area is one particular of her best characteristics. Even far more precious are the means in which Smith utilizes space as perfectly as her gravity, which attracts a number of defenders and frees up teammates.

Then there are the objectives, which Smith has been scoring for entertaining just lately. On Apr. 9 she netted a hat trick for the U.S. Women’s National Workforce towards Uzbekistan, even though her early goal towards San Diego on Apr. 17 arrived from a properly-pushed shot outdoors the box.

With Morgan Weaver, Janine Beckie and Christine Sinclair along the front line, the Thorns have attacking solutions all around the industry, but it is normally Smith who makes matters click. When Portland requires to break down a compact protection, it can just look for the 3rd-calendar year ahead. The similar can be claimed when the team wants to produce a bit much more energy.

Immediately after a thirty day period in which Smith could not quit scoring for the two club and state, the hope is that her type interprets to the standard time.

Protection stays steady

With a new head mentor and a shuffle in midfield, the Thorns endured several improvements due to the fact the close of final time. A single look at the back again line, nonetheless, helps make it feel as if nothing has transformed.

Kelli Hubly, Emily Menges, Madison Pogarch, and Klingenberg started out together against Angel Metropolis, when Natalia Kuikka and Becky Sauerbrunn return for yet another year. Driving them in intention, just like last year, is Bella Bixby.

The unit’s familiarity showed all over the Obstacle Cup as it stored two thoroughly clean sheets and allowed 5 objectives via 6 matches.

“I assumed defensively we ended up rather productive,” Bixby said.

In the a few Problem Cups that Portland has participated in, it has only conceded much more than a single purpose in a activity two times, a testament to its common protection that carries on to just take positive techniques early in a year.

The overall cohesion has also allowed the Thorns’ protection to construct off a good foundation, obtain extra recreation expertise with each other and continue on to learn in preparing for the normal year.

“We are all understanding at the identical time,” defender Emily Menges said after the Thorns’ 1- decline to OL Reign on Apr. 2. “Nobody’s ahead of any individual else. It will take a ton of interaction from every person. I think it’s coming with each other properly and we’re accomplishing a whole lot of techniques during the week. We’re all understanding at the similar level.”

What does a fully wholesome Portland glimpse like?

There had been stretches of engage in in this season’s Problem Cup where by it became simple to discern the style of staff the Thorns hope to be this year.

When clicking on all cylinders, Portland shown fluid movement and unique brilliance, hunting ever more comfy in possession. But, with it nonetheless remaining preseason, all those times came several and much amongst.

There were being online games in which the Thorns scored 3 aims, some coming in short bursts, and many others the place they struggled to crank out even a person target-scoring option. When wanting again on the 6 online games that designed up this season’s Challenge Cup, it’s vital to bear in mind that Wilkinson has not experienced a finish selection of gamers readily available to her however.

The finest reminder of that arrived Sunday wherever the Thorns had 5 gamers – which includes a few starters from the previous 7 days – absent owing to wellness and basic safety protocols. In addition, Portland was devoid of Crystal Dunn, at present on maternity go away, and Sauerbrunn, who is however recovering from a torn proper meniscus.

What does this Thorns staff seem like when everyone is nutritious and obtainable? It is challenging to notify so early in the yr, but the club exhibited just sufficient teasing glimpses in the course of the Challenge Cup.

“I think the toughness of this team is that we want to earn, and we also assume we can create good quality final results and wins with anyone on the pitch,” Klingenberg claimed. “I actually imagine in our main group of players, and it has been enjoyable to see these players action on the discipline for the duration of this difficult time and see what they’re created of.”

Classes discovered

While structured as a aggressive tournament, the Problem Cup nevertheless serves as a sort of preseason for the league’s 12 clubs. The 6 confirmed games are intended for mastering, employing new concepts and fantastic-tuning in advance of a grueling normal year. Portland took complete gain of that opportunity in the course of the tournament.

“The term that will come to thoughts when I assume about the Problem Cup for us so significantly is just advancement,” midfielder Sam Coffey explained just after the Thorns’ 3-2 acquire versus San Diego on Apr. 17. “I assume we’ve completed some things unbelievably very well and I never imagine we consider time to truly factor in just how a lot transform there is. New coach, new gamers, there is a good deal of adjust within the club ideal but we’re learning from anything.”

Some of that expansion arrived tactically, these kinds of as when Wilkinson experimented with a 4-3-3 framework for the 1st time towards San Diego. Other places were psychological, like the team’s technique to struggling with a deficit. After Portland’s 1- decline in opposition to Angel Town on Sunday, Bixby talked about how the crew wishes to be in a position to dictate and manage distinctive sorts of game titles as effectively as prevent drops in momentum.

“We’ve experienced online games in which we have started really potent and then missing it in the second 50 {e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf},” Bixby explained. “We’ve had games where by we’ve commenced flatfooted and then appear back again and genuinely showed who we are. Then we have online games like this wherever it is up and down all over the entire activity.”

Seeking to discover any kind of rhythm when tinkering with new formations, positions and gamers is a great deal for everyone to deal with, but there was no superior area for Wilkinson and her group to do so than in a aggressive preseason.

“Those matters appear with a tiny bit of time, a little little bit of working experience and that is a little something that we received [against Angel City],” Klingenberg stated. “I assume that’s invaluable for the normal year.”

Posted on

FARGO BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES REGULAR – InForum

FARGO BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING November 23, 2021 The Board of Education of the City of Fargo met in regular session on Tuesday, November 23, 2021, virtually via Zoom webinar teleconferencing. Members present: Jennifer Benson, Jim Johnson, Robin Nelson, Nikkie Gullickson, Rebecca Knutson, Tracie Newman, Seth Holden, Brian Nelson, David Paulson Members absent: none Vice President Robin Nelson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. She was leading the meeting for President Knutson as President Knutson was not able to virtually join the meeting with her video on but would join via phone. The next Board meeting is planned to be in person as the Board Room at the District Office will by then have the audio-visual equipment installed. Jim Johnson moved approval of the agenda with the addition of an HR Addendum added to 5.B. Tracie Newman seconded the motion. The agenda was approved as presented (Yes: Benson, Gullickson, Holden, Johnson, Knutson, Nelson, B., Nelson, R., Newman, Paulson). Five citizens addressed the Board. Matt Kosak shared concerns about the disinformation being shared at Board meetings during the public comment period and about comments made by Board member Brian Nelson during the November 9 Board meeting on masking. Kristin Sharbono, parent in the Carl Ben Eielson Middle School and South High School attendance area, asked for a response at the November 9 meeting but has not received one. She requested a written response on what was used to determine a mask mandate was needed during instructional time, why it was needed in schools but not in the District Office, and who from Fargo Cass Public Health is meeting with the District. She asked to be informed of when the District is meeting with Fargo Cass Public Health. She asked for a written response on what is being done on staff morale. Vice President Robin Nelson indicated a response was sent to her from the last Board meeting. Jake Schmitz, a parent of two students in the Fargo Public Schools, asked for a written response on who from Fargo Cass Public School is giving recommendations to Dr. Gandhi, what has changed to remove the mask mandate in January, and why is there still a mask mandate for middle and high schools. Cassie Schmidt, with Let Parents Decide That, commended the previous speakers for their comments. She asked for a public response to all the questions asked as stake holders wants those questions. She shared concerns on Board member Brian Nelson’s comments at the November 9 Board meeting on his work as a superintendent in other school districts and concerns on the ESSER plan in Rosholt, ND. She called for Mr. Nelson to resign his position on the Fargo School Board. She indicated that the North Dakota Century Code provided to her in the response to her November 9 questions does not give the authority to the Board to have a mask mandate in schools. Alexis Scott shared concerns on public comment via Zoom teleconferencing and public commenters not being able to be seen on video. She also shared concerns on academic achievement results for diverse students. She also encouraged parents to assist in schools and support teachers. Dr. Patty Cummings, director of special education, shared about the District’s partnership with the University of Minnesota focusing on the special education department. Kim Gibbons of the University of Minnesota provided an overview of the comprehensive program evaluation through the university’s Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement of the FPS special education program. She shared the findings of their evaluation that focused on programming, staffing and infrastructure, and student outcomes. The evaluation included a literature review, focus groups and interviews, staff surveys and a data review. Discussion occurred. It was noted the findings should be looked at for a 3-5 year period and not worked on all at once. The UofM team is working with the District on an implementation plan. FEA President Kim Belgarde shared that during American Education Week the FEA raised $1,000 for the senior high scholarship program. She also shared that the FEA is in favor of reinstating COVID-19 leave for staff members. She welcomes any questions from Board members on the ESSER project Dr. Gandhi will share during his report. Ms. Belgarde shared that the Recess Commission is meeting and will wrap in January, and the Salary Commission has also started meeting. Dr. Gandhi shared a presentation on a project using ESSER funds the District is receiving. The presentation was provided earlier in the day to the Planning Committee; Dr. Gandhi was asked to present it to the full Board. The name of the project is “All For One, One For All.” This project will improve instruction for all students in the Fargo Public Schools and help address critical shortage areas of employment that specifically impact students falling behind by creating a larger pool of internal candidates that can fill the identified critical shortage areas. The project would be to support teachers to receive an additional teaching endorsement and training specific to students with diverse needs. This would improve self-efficacy and instructional practice of all educators by providing each educator with additional tools that can be used to meet the needs of all students. Teachers could receive professional development and an endorsement in special education (special education LD or special education ED) and or in English learners. The project is optional for teachers to participate. Staff members who hold a ND Educator License eligible to receive the additional endorsements approved in this program will receive a one-time payment of $6,000 if they obtain the approved additional endorsement and proof of receiving the additional endorsement is submitted to the FPS HR Department prior to July 29, 2022 with employees receiving a one-time payment of $6,000 on their September paycheck in 2022-23 school year. A second opportunity would be available in the following school year. Employees will not receive compensation for more than one additional endorsement each year. Employees may obtain two additional endorsements for a total additional endorsement of $12,000. FPS will pay for the application fee to ESPB (one time per endorsement) and pay for the Praxis exam fee (one time per endorsement). FPS will also pay instructional staff up to five days of Professional Development at the employee’s daily rate of pay; the dates in 2022 would be scheduled for May 31-June 2 after the school year has ended. Two professional development opportunities would be held in 2023. If participation is low in the program, FPS will then use ESSER funds for previously planned projects. After receiving the endorsement and compensation, the employee is under no commitment to FPS (beyond the annual contract currently in). Staff members will not necessarily be reassigned or required to teach in the new endorsement area. Administration is looking to update administrative policy with this provision for this specific project. Discussion occurred. It was reiterated that the program would be voluntary for participation. Per a request from Jennifer Benson, Dr. Gandhi shared on the Be Legendary Institute, a Board member training program, being offered by ND Department of Public Instruction and how it relates to the Board’s current policy governance model. This topic was also discussed at a recent Governance Committee meeting. Discussion occurred. The deadline to apply for the institute, which costs would be partially covered by ND DPI, is November 30. Tracie Newman moved approval of the Consent Agenda with the HR addendum. Nikkie Gullickson seconded the motion which passed (Yes: Benson, Gullickson, Knutson, Nelson, B., Nelson, R., Newman, Paulson; Absent: Holden, Johnson) thereby causing the following actions to be taken: A. The minutes of the regular meeting of November 9 were approved as written. B. The following Human Resources actions were approved: 1. New Hires: Tony Huseby, Grant Manager – District Office, MSUM/University of MN, Contracted Salary – at 100{e4f787673fbda589a16c4acddca5ba6fa1cbf0bc0eb53f36e5f8309f6ee846cf} – $83,873 – (196 days) 2. Resignations 2021-22: Jordan Johnson, Grade 5 – Jefferson, Dates of Employment: 2021, Effective Date: 11-30-2021; Katharine McArthur, Language Arts – Carl Ben, Dates of Employment: 2008-2021, Effective Date: 11-19-2021; Emily Schultz, Art – Bennett, Dates of Employment: 2006-2021, Effective Date: 12-03-2021 C. The following financial reports were approved: 1. The Fund Balance Report for October 2. The Revenue and Expenditure Reports for October 3. Statement of Bank Reconciliation for October 4. Check register for October Dr. Gandhi shared he was asked by the Governance Committee to share what was previously shared in the Superintendent Report in the Business Section of the agenda. Dr. Gandhi provided an update on COVID-19 positive case data. He shared data of positive cases by school week for the school year and in comparison to the 2020-21 school year, and shared mask exemption, vaccination exemption, and COVID-19 testing program data that allowed students to stay in school due to a COVID-19 close contact. Recently, FPS received updated guidance from Fargo Cass Public Health. As of January 17, FPS will change to a strongly recommended stance on masks in buildings during instructional hours. Per follow up conversations with the ND Department of Health, the district will also change to quarantining being optional for close contacts at that time. Notification to families for positive cases will also change and contact tracing as it is currently conducted will end. Discussion occurred. Jennifer Benson moved the Board of Education end the mask mandate as well as the quarantine mandate for Fargo Public Schools and leave it as a recommendation. David Paulson seconded the motion. Discussion occurred. Upon call of the roll, the motion failed (Yes: Benson, Paulson; No: Gullickson, Knutson, Nelson, B., Nelson, R., Newman; Absent: Holden, Johnson). Due to time, Board Reports were forwarded to the next meeting agenda. The next regular meeting was confirmed for Tuesday, December 14 at 5:30 p.m. There being no further business to come before the Board, Vice President Nelson declared the meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m. OCTOBER 2021 PAYMENTS MADE 702 COMMUNICATIONS $ 4,631.96 ; A & R ROOFING CO $ 554.00 ; A.S.P. OF MOORHEAD, INC $ 803.66 ; A.S.P. OF MOORHEAD, INC $ 6,432.59 ; A-1 SEWER & DRAIN $ 92.00 ; A-1 SEWER & DRAIN $ 598.00 ; AARFOR, JOHN WILLIAM $ 75.00 ; AARFOR, JOHN WILLIAM $ 150.00 ; AARFOR, JOHN WILLIAM $ 234.50 ; ABDO PUBLISHING COMPANY $ 2,507.80 ; ACME TOOLS $ 2,144.99 ; ACME TOOLS $ 6,192.35 ; ADVANCED ENGRAVING INC $ 97.00 ; ADVANCED ENGRAVING INC $ 13,936.00 ; ADVANTAGE CREDIT BUREAU $ 7,287.00 ; AIR MECHANICAL $ 24,276.37 ; AJANI, THEODORA $ 59.75 ; ALLIED 100 $ 1,664.90 ; ALOMAR, ALI $ 130.00 ; AMAZON.COM $ 51,376.79 ; AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY $ 3,264.46 ; AMERICAN MATH COMPETITIONS $ 246.00 ; AMERICAN RED CROSS $ 496.80 ; ANDERSON STEEL ERECTION AND CRANE SERVICES $ 37,008.95 ; ANDERSON, EDITH $ 508.94 ; ANDERSON, JULIE M $ 35.78 ; ANDERSON’S $ 797.57 ; APPLE COMPUTERS $ 1,048.50 ; APPLE COMPUTERS $ 5,980.00 ; APPLE COMPUTERS $ 22,317.00 ; ARAMARK $ 53.95 ; ARAMARK $ 62.43 ; ARAMARK $ 116.38 ; ART & LEARN $ 180.83 ; ASSOCIATED SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. $ 580.78 ; ASSOCIATED SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. $ 6,542.00 ; AUDIO CONSULTANTS $ 2,000.00 ; AVESIS $ 19,205.22 ; AVI SYSTEMS, INC $ 18,678.00 ; AXTMAN, SARAH $ 74.37 ; AZURE, SYDNEY $ 57.01 ; BACKER, JONATHON LESTER $ 84.50 ; BACKLUND, JILL $ 600.00 ; BAKER NURSERY GARDENS $ 180.92 ; BARCODES DISCOUNT $ 248.32 ; BARCODES DISCOUNT $ 1,386.18 ; BARNES & NOBLE $ 377.65 ; BARNUM, KATY $ 133.06 ; BARNUM, KATY $ 660.00 ; BARNUM, KATY $ 1,320.00 ; BAYMONT INN & SUITES $ 192.00 ; BAYMONT INN & SUITES $ 1,036.80 ; BEANS COFFEE $ 148.40 ; BEATON, MICHAEL $ 90.72 ; BEE SEEN GEAR $ 51.50 ; BEECHIE, LEANNE $ 50.00 ; BEECHIE, LEANNE $ 50.00 ; BEECHIE, LEANNE $ 50.00 ; BEECHIE, LEANNE $ 100.00 ; BELL BANK $ 3,198.05 ; BELLWETHER $ 606.40 ; BENCHMARK EDUCATION $ 55,825.00 ; BENSON, JAMIE $ 49.28 ; BERNATELLO’S $ 312.00 ; BERNATELLO’S $ 693.00 ; BEST BUY COMPANY $ 3,899.94 ; BEYOND BOUNDARIES OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY $ 9,540.85 ; BIGGS-TERNES, CASSANDRA $ 14.00 ; BINA, ZAUNDRA D $ 139.50 ; BINA, ZAUNDRA D $ 279.00 ; BIVER, MICHELLE $ 210.00 ; BIX PRODUCE $ 16,475.20 ; BLICK ART MATERIALS $ 44.85 ; BLICK ART MATERIALS $ 182.47 ; BLICK ART MATERIALS $ 1,966.77 ; BLONIGEN, MARK G. $ 139.50 ; BLOWS SEW & VAC $ 1,999.00 ; BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD $ 291,813.13 ; BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD $ 361,147.66 ; BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD $ 376,266.20 ; BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD $ 411,297.14 ; BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD $ 490,655.27 ; BOEHM, TRACY $ 1,410.00 ; BOOMBAH $ 1,499.70 ; BORDER STATES ELECTRIC $ 2,985.07 ; BORDER STATES ELECTRIC $ 3,555.80 ; BORDER STATES ELECTRIC $ 3,878.58 ; BORENSON AND ASSOCIATES $ 25.00 ; BOROWICZ, KILEY $ 35.00 ; BOROWICZ, KILEY $ 70.00 ; BOROWICZ, KILEY $ 105.00 ; BOSAK-BOVKOON, TRICIA $ 101.00 ; BOSCH, CHELSEY LEE $ 1,500.00 ; BOYLE, DARLENE $ 66.25 ; BRAUN, MADELINE $ 450.00 ; BREEN, JIM P $ 84.50 ; BREEN, JIM P $ 150.00 ; BREEN, JIM P $ 150.00 ; BREEN, PAT $ 84.50 ; BRENDEN, STEPHANIE ANN $ 139.50 ; BRENDEN, STEPHANIE ANN $ 178.00 ; BRONAUGH, PRESTON T $ 75.00 ; BRONAUGH, PRESTON T $ 84.50 ; BRONAUGH, PRESTON T $ 150.00 ; BSN SPORTS $ 3,917.15 ; BSN SPORTS $ 17,743.76 ; BUNKOWSKI, KAYLA $ 68.99 ; BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION $ 41.25 ; BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION $ 41.25 ; BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION $ 165.00 ; BUREAU OF EDUCATION & RESEARCH $ 279.00 ; BUSINESS ESSENTIALS $ 2,704.98 ; BUSINESS ESSENTIALS $ 21,363.38 ; BUSINESS ESSENTIALS $ 93,746.79 ; BUSINESSOLVER $ 8,818.40 ; BYTESPEED $ 8,745.00 ; CADENCE INSOLES $ 42.00 ; CAMERON, JOHN $ 150.00 ; CANAMAR, NOEMI $ 459.59 ; CARNEY, JEREMY W $ 84.50 ; CARNEY, JEREMY W $ 84.50 ; CAROLINA BIOLOGICAL $ 173.33 ; CASH WISE FOODS $ 394.63 ; CASH WISE FOODS $ 721.50 ; CASH-WA DISTRIBUTING $ 158.60 ; CASS CLAY CREAMERY $ 2,078.00 ; CASS CLAY CREAMERY $ 12,669.20 ; CASS CLAY CREAMERY $ 24,594.26 ; CASS RURAL WATER $ 12,809.58 ; CDW G CORPORATE OFFICE $ 575.15 ; CDW G CORPORATE OFFICE $ 863.70 ; CENGAGE LEARNING $ 105.60 ; CENTERING ON CHILDREN $ 1,018.64 ; CENTRAL DOOR & HARDWARE $ 29,060.05 ; CENTRAL MCGOWEN $ 4,772.80 ; CERNEY, CHRISTOPHER $ 36.00 ; CERNEY, CHRISTOPHER $ 36.00 ; CHARLIE & SONS ELECTRIC $ 11,527.00 ; CHEERSOUNDS $ 123.00 ; CHICK-FIL-A $ 175.00 ; CHICK-FIL-A $ 260.00 ; CHICK-FIL-A $ 260.00 ; CHILLER SYSTEMS, INC $ 4,356.00 ; CHOICE IT GLOBAL LLC $ 5,239.00 ; CHRISTIANSON, JOHN BRADLEY $ 234.50 ; CHRISTIANSON, KENT WAYNE $ 150.00 ; CI SPORT $ 905.50 ; CI SPORT $ 5,364.00 ; CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE $ 31,131.15 ; CITY OF FARGO $ 124.94 ; CITY OF FARGO $ 222.20 ; CITY OF FARGO $ 276.71 ; CITY OF FARGO $ 12,586.52 ; CLAPP, EDWIN $ 780.50 ; CLEARINGHOUSE $ 51.95 ; CLEARINGHOUSE $ 74.80 ; CLOSING THE GAP $ 510.00 ; COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY HIGH COUNTRY $ 667.60 ; COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY HIGH COUNTRY $ 1,019.90 ; COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY HIGH COUNTRY $ 1,532.76 ; COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY HIGH COUNTRY $ 1,728.46 ; COLE PAPER COMPANY $ 4,111.25 ; COLE PAPER COMPANY $ 4,494.94 ; COLE PAPER COMPANY $ 13,780.69 ; COLE PAPER COMPANY $ 17,425.79 ; COLES, KADE M $ 60.70 ; COMFORT INN $ 1,209.60 ; CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS $ 278.51 ; CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS $ 10,976.71 ; CORPORATE TECHNOLOGIES $ 2,277.50 ; CORPORATE TECHNOLOGIES $ 285,000.00 ; COSTCO $ 78.82 ; COSTCO $ 96.19 ; COSTCO $ 127.51 ; COSTCO $ 268.42 ; COSTCO $ 312.13 ; COTE, TERRY $ 81.14 ; COUCHMAN, TIM E $ 84.50 ; COURTS PLUS FITNESS CENTER $ 70.00 ; COVER ONE $ 66.90 ; CRISIS PREVENTION INSTITUTE $ 649.50 ; CRISIS PREVENTION INSTITUTE $ 799.80 ; CRISIS PREVENTION INSTITUTE $ 1,799.55 ; CROWN TROPHY $ 66.75 ; CROWN TROPHY $ 221.00 ; CROWN TROPHY $ 587.00 ; CSTAND $ 170.00 ; CULINEX $ 21.38 ; CULINEX $ 34.68 ; CULINEX $ 175.80 ; CULINEX $ 1,617.95 ; CUMMINGS, PATRICIA $ 269.08 ; DACOTAH PAPER COMPANY $ 709.54 ; DACOTAH PAPER COMPANY $ 8,379.98 ; DACOTAH TECH APPLIANCE LLC $ 349.02 ; DAKOTA FENCE $ 2,613.00 ; DAKOTA MEDICAL FOUNDATION $ 400.00 ; DAKOTA MEDICAL FOUNDATION $ 907.83 ; DAKOTA REFRIGERATION INC $ 451.00 ; DAKOTA REFRIGERATION INC $ 4,178.20 ; DECA $ 816.00 ; DECA $ 900.00 ; DECA $ 1,332.00 ; DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA $ 5,736.90 ; DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA $ 20,657.97 ; DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA $ 21,569.53 ; DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA $ 23,051.02 ; DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA $ 23,470.29 ; DELTA DENTAL OF MINNESOTA $ 28,019.72 ; DELTAMATH SOLUTIONS $ 95.00 ; DEMCO $ 78.07 ; DEMCO $ 253.54 ; DEMCO $ 1,215.59 ; DENAULT, JENNIFER $ 19.64 ; DESIGNER CARE CO LTD $ 6,384.00 ; DESIGNER CARE CO LTD $ 12,768.00 ; DIRT DYNAMICS $ 33,218.91 ; DISCOVERY BENEFITS $ 37,565.50 ; DISCOVERY BENEFITS $ 37,608.88 ; DISCOVERY BENEFITS $ 192,673.24 ; DITTMER CONCRETE $ 3,000.00 ; DOKARA, AMEL $ 118.00 ; DOLYNIUK, SYDNEY $ 720.33 ; DOMINO’S PIZZA $ 168.25 ; DOMINO’S PIZZA $ 274.37 ; DONAT, PATRICIA $ 281.02 ; DOUGHERTY, JAIME $ 17.91 ; DOVER PUBLICATIONS $ 183.93 ; DOYLE SECURITY PRODUCTS $ 1,129.96 ; DOYLE SECURITY PRODUCTS $ 1,129.96 ; D-S BEVERAGES INC $ 162.00 ; DUFFEY FEELEY, LANA $ 47.77 ; DUNN, CONNOR J $ 147.00 ; DUNN, CONNOR J $ 210.00 ; DUNN, CONNOR J $ 225.00 ; DUNN, DYLAN $ 225.00 ; DURGIN, DOUGLAS R $ 84.50 ; DURGIN, DOUGLAS R $ 225.00 ; EASTERN DAKOTA CONFERENCE $ 600.00 ; ECKROTH MUSIC $ 598.99 ; ECOLAB $ 963.21 ; EDGEWOOD GOLF COURSE $ 450.00 ; EDHELPER $ 1,199.40 ; EDUCATORS BENEFIT CONSULTANTS $ 468.09 ; EDUCATORS BENEFIT CONSULTANTS 403 $ 9,064.05 ; EDUCATORS BENEFIT CONSULTANTS 403 $ 9,633.72 ; EDUCATORS BENEFIT CONSULTANTS 403 $ 100,516.46 ; EHLKE, SANDRA $ 540.00 ; ELLIS, RACHEL $ 87.36 ; ELSMORE AQUATIC $ 2,835.00 ; EMIL, WAYNE $ 100.00 ; EMIL, WAYNE $ 159.50 ; ENGRAPHIX $ 2,053.60 ; ERBERT & GERBERT $ 254.37 ; ERSTAD, BRYAN $ 84.50 ; ESPECIAL NEEDS LLC $ 38.90 ; EVERYDAY SPEECH $ 135.00 ; FAIRFIELD INN $ 1,532.46 ; FAR FROM NORMAL $ 158.70 ; FARGO 3D PRINTER REPAIR $ 265.00 ; FARGO EDUCATION ASSOC $ 41.43 ; FARGO EDUCATION ASSOC $ 41.43 ; FARGO EDUCATION ASSOC $ 8,865.13 ; FARGO NORTHWEST PIPE FITTINGS $ 14,373.74 ; FARGO PARK DISTRICT $ 20,000.00 ; FARGO POLICE DEPARTMENT $ 10.00 ; FARGO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION $ 110.00 ; FARGO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION $ 110.00 ; FARGO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION $ 431.68 ; FARGO ROTARY CLUB $ 215.00 ; FARGO THEATRE $ 1,885.00 ; FARGO TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT $ 76.56 ; FARGO TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT $ 243.98 ; FARGO WATER DEPT $ 8,554.19 ; FARGO WATER DEPT $ 22,175.06 ; FARKAS, TYLER $ 84.50 ; FAULKNER, LYDIA $ 190.30 ; FCCLA $ 182.00 ; FCCLA $ 273.00 ; FERGUSON $ 440.75 ; FEVIG OIL COMPANY $ 179.35 ; FIELD, KATIE $ 5.04 ; FIRST AVENUE PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS $ 598.20 ; FIRST AVENUE PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS $ 1,400.00 ; FIRST CHOICE APPAREL & EMBROIDERY $ 324.00 ; FIRST EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES $ 198.00 ; FISCHER, JOHNATHAN $ 450.00 ; FLIETH, KARISSA $ 3,000.00 ; F-M FLOORING $ 9,900.00 ; FMHRA $ 199.00 ; FOERSTER, CHRISTOPHER $ 780.00 ; FOLDEN, KENNEDY $ 38.50 ; FOLDEN, KENNEDY $ 77.00 ; FOLLETT SCHOOL SOLUTIONS INC $ 5,010.52 ; FOLLETT SCHOOL SOLUTIONS INC $ 23,621.95 ; FORKS LATH AND PLASTER $ 3,073.50 ; FORUM $ 20.25 ; FORUM $ 655.29 ; FORUM $ 1,099.00 ; FORUM $ 1,223.91 ; FOX, GUY $ 450.00 ; FRANCIS HOWELL HIGH SCHOOL $ 1,020.00 ; FROSTY FRUIT $ 1,380.00 ; FROSTY FRUIT $ 2,530.00 ; FRS $ 172.00 ; FULL CIRCLE PEDIATRIC SOLUTIONS $ 660.00 ; FULL CIRCLE PEDIATRIC SOLUTIONS $ 22,417.00 ; G & R CONTROLS $ 1,077.00 ; G & R CONTROLS $ 1,110.00 ; GADDIE, CARLY $ 80.08 ; GATE CITY BANK $ 370.36 ; GATE CITY BANK $ 3,244.20 ; GEHRTZ CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $ 464.00 ; GEISZLER, GRANT $ 75.00 ; GEISZLER, GRANT $ 84.50 ; GELLNER, RYAN D $ 84.50 ; GENERAL PARTS $ 174.00 ; GENERAL PARTS $ 379.25 ; GENERAL PARTS $ 698.19 ; GENERAL PARTS $ 814.28 ; GERRELLS SPORT CENTER $ 8,515.00 ; GLASER, DEBORAH R EdD, LLC $ 9,675.00 ; GLENDALE PARADE STORE $ 214.45 ; GO PROMO, LLC $ 1,104.50 ; GOERTS, SARAH $ 97.89 ; GOPHER SPORTS EQUIPMENT $ 2,650.98 ; GRACENOTES $ 2,700.00 ; GRAINGER $ 630.00 ; GRAINGER $ 1,760.75 ; GRAINGER $ 2,616.22 ; GRANDE, TRISSA $ 38.50 ; GRANDE, TRISSA $ 77.00 ; GRANDE, TRISSA $ 77.00 ; GRANT’S MECHANICAL, LLC $ 13,653.05 ; GRESHAM, RON $ 30.00 ; GUDMUNDSON, CYDNEY $ 300.00 ; GUMKE, KELSEY $ 220.08 ; GUNNERSON, MICHAEL $ 348.15 ; H2I GROUP $ 639.00 ; HABERDASHERY CORPORATE APPAREL $ 343.00 ; HAHN, KAYLEE $ 33.54 ; HAJICEK, MARNI R. $ 139.50 ; HAJICEK, MARNI R. $ 418.50 ; HAMILTON, BRITTNEY $ 71.06 ; HANSEN, DOUGLAS $ 55.97 ; HANSON, ERIKA $ 32.65 ; HANSON, LIANN $ 154.91 ; HANSON, SHAWN $ 90.00 ; HANSON, SHAWN $ 150.00 ; HANSON, SHAWN $ 324.00 ; HANSON, STAN $ 84.50 ; HANSON, STAN $ 90.00 ; HANSON, STAN $ 150.00 ; HANSON, STAN $ 225.00 ; HARTER, JANICE $ 209.50 ; HARTZE, STEVEN $ 110.50 ; HASTY AWARDS $ 191.10 ; HAWKINS $ 449.63 ; HAWKINS $ 692.23 ; HAWKINS $ 815.41 ; HAWTHORNE EDUCATIONAL SERVICE $ 150.00 ; HB SOUND & LIGHT $ 290.92 ; HEARING SOLUTIONS, INC $ 3,200.00 ; HEARTLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS $ 5,551.25 ; HECKAMAN, DANIEL $ 87.00 ; HECKAMAN, DANIEL $ 125.50 ; HECKAMAN, DANIEL $ 149.50 ; HEGGERTY PHONEMIC AWARENESS $ 159.95 ; HEINEMANN $ 935.00 ; HEINEMANN $ 5,095.75 ; HEINSCH, CARTER $ 131.00 ; HEINSCH, CARTER $ 156.00 ; HERTZ RENT A CAR $ 150.00 ; HERTZ RENT A CAR $ 250.00 ; HERTZ RENT A CAR $ 300.00 ; HERTZ RENT A CAR $ 450.00 ; HERTZ RENT A CAR $ 528.13 ; HERZOG ROOFING $ 13,577.04 ; HESS, JENNIFER $ 291.52 ; HETLAND PRODUCTIONS $ 400.00 ; HETZLER, CHRISTOPHER JAMES $ 125.50 ; HILDE, ALLISON $ 77.00 ; HILDE, ALLISON $ 77.00 ; HODGE PRODUCTS, INC $ 1,300.00 ; HOESEHEN, ALLISON $ 450.00 ; HOESLEY, DEBRA $ 50.00 ; HOLDER, ALAYNA $ 105.00 ; HOLDER, ALAYNA $ 105.00 ; HOLEN, ANTHONY $ 84.50 ; HOLIDAY INN $ 2,419.20 ; HOLLAND, JASON $ 52.50 ; HOLLCRAFT, MEREDITH $ 139.50 ; HOLLCRAFT, MEREDITH $ 139.50 ; HOLLERUNG, KAREN $ 28.11 ; HOLTEN, CORY $ 242.00 ; HOLZER, BLAIR $ 38.86 ; HORNBACHER’S $ 1,958.73 ; HORSLEY SPECIALITIES INC $ 6,375.00 ; HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT $ 88.40 ; HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT $ 3,956.28 ; HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT $ 93,102.72 ; HOVDA, ALLYSON $ 281.02 ; INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES $ 290.79 ; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPT $ 30.00 ; INNOVATIVE GYM SOLUTIONS $ 240.00 ; INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS $ 166.43 ; INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS $ 202.86 ; INSTRUCTURE $ 750.00 ; INTERIOR AFFAIRS $ 4,241.70 ; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $ 245,374.71 ; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $ 266,552.28 ; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $ 1,674,395.55 ; INTERWORLD HIGHWAY $ 243.32 ; INTERWORLD HIGHWAY $ 15,717.75 ; IPOP $ 150.00 ; IPOP $ 212.00 ; J & L SPORTS INC $ 4,841.00 ; J & R SCHOOL SUPPLIES, INC $ 299.00 ; JAYS SMOKIN BBQ $ 384.00 ; JOB SERVICE NORTH DAKOTA $ 2,092.25 ; JOHNSON CONTROLS $ 279.00 ; JOHNSON CONTROLS $ 320.00 ; JOHNSON CONTROLS $ 867.50 ; JOHNSON CONTROLS $ 940.00 ; JOHNSON, ADELINE $ 25.54 ; JOHNSON, TODD $ 230.58 ; JONAS, DENISE $ 67.87 ; JONES, ADAM STEVEN $ 169.00 ; JOSTENS $ 756.30 ; JP MORGAN CHASE $ 505,248.83 ; JT LAWN SERVICE $ 1,181.00 ; JT LAWN SERVICE $ 2,412.00 ; KADING, JOSHUA $ 363.74 ; KALDOR, MARSHALL $ 75.00 ; KALDOR, MARSHALL $ 84.50 ; KAMPA, HANAH $ 930.00 ; KARSKY, TIM $ 84.50 ; KBRO METALWORKS $ 171.88 ; KELVIN $ 533.05 ; KERBAUGH, BRENDA $ 39.70 ; KESSLER, KEVIN D $ 105.00 ; KIDS DISCOVER $ 10,972.50 ; KRAFT, ARTHUR A $ 75.00 ; KRAFT, ARTHUR A $ 150.00 ; KRAFT, ARTHUR A $ 150.00 ; KRINGLIE, KELLIE $ 33.38 ; KRUIZE, HANNAH $ 70.00 ; KRUIZE, HANNAH $ 105.00 ; KRUIZE, HANNAH $ 105.00 ; KUENEMAN, KADEN $ 84.50 ; KUENEMAN, ROB J $ 84.50 ; LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS $ 720.10 ; LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS $ 790.99 ; LAMPERTS YARDS $ 252.39 ; LARSON, SHANNON M. $ 74.20 ; LAUER, LOUIS $ 263.52 ; LEAGUE LEGACY $ 545.82 ; LEAGUE LEGACY $ 681.01 ; LEAN, PAUL $ 52.50 ; LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES, INC $ 104.75 ; LEARNING WITHOUT TEARS $ 525.25 ; LEGO EDUCATION $ 287.60 ; LEIER, MICHAEL R $ 70.00 ; LEIER, MICHAEL R $ 70.00 ; LEIER, WESLEY D $ 118.00 ; LEVENGER $ 980.80 ; LIEN, MICHAEL $ 75.00 ; LIEN, MICHAEL $ 150.00 ; LOCH, MADISON $ 51.63 ; LOFFLER COMPANIES $ 6,426.09 ; LOGO 2 PROMO $ 52.45 ; LONG, COURTNEY $ 70.00 ; LUTTIO, JEREMY D $ 139.50 ; LYONS, KAITLAN $ 75.49 ; M & J AUTO PARTS INC $ 340.20 ; M & J AUTO PARTS INC $ 1,198.86 ; MACGILL SUPPLIES $ 37.95 ; MACKIN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES $ 909.51 ; MAC’S $ 53.95 ; MADSON, ROXANNE $ 135.00 ; MAGNUM ELECTRIC $ 3,492.00 ; MAKI, JACOB TIMOTHY $ 57.63 ; MARCO $ 24,154.63 ; MARCO $ 72,034.92 ; MARCO LEARNING $ 1,998.00 ; MARCO PRODUCTS, INC $ 227.78 ; MARCO’S PIZZA $ 143.40 ; MARCO’S PIZZA $ 289.27 ; MARK FORKNER SPECIALTIES $ 460.07 ; MARKERBOARD PEOPLE $ 6,480.00 ; MARRIOTT HOTELS $ 1,425.00 ; MARTIN, TRAVIS L. $ 84.50 ; MARTINSON, LOIS JEANETTE $ 70.00 ; MARTINSON, LOIS JEANETTE $ 105.00 ; MARTINSON, LOIS JEANETTE $ 175.00 ; MARZANO RESOURCES $ 1,680.00 ; MASTEL, MARY BETH $ 165.00 ; MATHCOUNTS $ 360.00 ; MAUCORT, BERNARD D $ 62.50 ; MAUCORT, BERNARD D $ 420.00 ; MBN ENGINEERING, INC $ 3,500.00 ; MCARTHUR TILE $ 5,503.39 ; MCGRAW HILL $ 652.35 ; MCGRAW HILL $ 2,686.54 ; MEAD AND HUNT $ 2,133.00 ; MEDCO SUPPLY COMPANY $ 59.88 ; MEDEX LOGISTICS $ 45.00 ; MEHL’S FLOUR COMPANY $ 683.98 ; MELBY, JILL $ 108.00 ; MENARDS $ 71.80 ; MENARDS $ 244.23 ; MENARDS $ 506.56 ; MENARDS $ 918.65 ; MENARDS $ 1,123.56 ; MERIDIAN COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION $ 6,722.45 ; MERIDIAN COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION $ 89,816.21 ; MICHAEL J BURNS ARCHITECTS $ 92.50 ; MIDWEST EDUCATIONAL CONSULTANTS $ 3,750.00 ; MIDWEST OVERHEAD CRANE CORP $ 302.34 ; MILLER, BRANT $ 75.00 ; MILLER, BRENTON $ 60.39 ; MILLER, HEATHER $ 263.52 ; MINKO CONSTRUCTION INC $ 3,150.00 ; MINKO CONSTRUCTION INC $ 37,739.00 ; MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT $ 132.90 ; MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT $ 132.90 ; MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $ 5,256.34 ; MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $ 5,827.84 ; MINNESOTA DEPT OF REVENUE $ 50,414.65 ; MINNKOTA RECYCLING $ 3,061.67 ; MISSISSIPPI DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES $ 18.46 ; MISSISSIPPI DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES $ 18.46 ; MITCHELL, EMMA $ 77.00 ; MN GIRLS BASKETBALL COACHES ASSOC $ 300.00 ; MOE, JAMES $ 367.00 ; MOELLER, ABIGAIL $ 40.60 ; MOEMS $ 119.00 ; MOEN PORTABLES & SEPIC $ 303.75 ; MOEN PORTABLES & SEPIC $ 385.00 ; MOEN PORTABLES & SEPIC $ 510.00 ; MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS COMPANY $ 2,966.80 ; MONACO $ 3,718.10 ; MONEY MOVERS $ 840.00 ; MONONO, EWUMBUA MENYOLI $ 130.00 ; MOORE, SHANE SR $ 75.00 ; MOORE, SHANE SR $ 75.00 ; MOORE, SHANE SR $ 100.00 ; MOORHEAD PUBLIC SERVICE $ 6,217.82 ; MOSYLE CORPORATION $ 80,190.00 ; MTI DISTRIBUTING $ 310.10 ; MURPHY, AMYJO $ 281.02 ; MUSIC EMPORIUM $ 170.00 ; MUSIC EMPORIUM $ 525.00 ; NAGEL, BRIANNA $ 450.00 ; NASCO $ 29.76 ; NASCO $ 158.00 ; NATIONAL SPEECH AND DEBATE ASSOC $ 177.00 ; NAT’L ASSOC FOR MUSIC EDUCATION $ 100.00 ; NAT’L ASSOC FOR MUSIC EDUCATION $ 140.00 ; ND ACDA $ 42.00 ; ND ACDA $ 84.00 ; ND ACDA $ 133.00 ; ND BOARD OF NURSING $ 60.00 ; ND BOARD OF NURSING $ 60.00 ; ND BOARD OF NURSING $ 240.00 ; ND COUNCIL OF EDUC LEADERS $ 700.00 ; ND COUNCIL OF EDUC LEADERS $ 880.00 ; ND COUNCIL OF EDUC LEADERS $ 1,580.00 ; ND DECA $ 180.00 ; ND DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES $ 175.00 ; ND HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOC $ 50.00 ; ND HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOC $ 50.00 ; ND HIGH SCHOOL COACHES ASSOC $ 90.00 ; ND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE $ 163,043.14 ; ND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIRE $ 414,973.41 ; ND STATE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE $ 1,328.00 ; ND STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $ 1,425.20 ; ND STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $ 1,692.16 ; ND STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $ 5,943.00 ; ND STATE LAND DEPT $ 5,204.12 ; ND STATE TAX COMMISSIONER $ 101,343.00 ; ND TEACHER FUND FOR RETIREMENT $ 1,839,384.00 ; NDADD $ 100.00 ; NDALL $ 1,440.00 ; NDSAA $ 105.00 ; NDSAA $ 2,280.00 ; NDSU $ 200.00 ; NDSU $ 400.00 ; NDSU $ 981.80 ; NDSU $ 1,080.00 ; NETCENTER SUPPLY $ 260.51 ; NEWLAND, STEPHANIE DAWN $ 172.80 ; NEZNIK, JENNIFER ANN $ 19.15 ; NFL ROUGH RIDER DISTRICT $ 145.00 ; NFL ROUGH RIDER DISTRICT $ 315.00 ; NFL ROUGH RIDER DISTRICT $ 1,220.00 ; NICHOLE’S $ 40.00 ; NOCTURNAL HOSPITALITY GROUP $ 1,080.65 ; NOESEN, MADISON $ 450.00 ; NOLD, JEFFREY WILLIAM $ 84.50 ; NORCOSTCO $ 234.74 ; NORLAND, KORA $ 35.00 ; NORLAND, KORA $ 70.00 ; NORLAND, KORA $ 70.00 ; NORTH DAKOTA LIBRARY ASSOC $ 310.00 ; NORTH DAKOTA ONE CALL $ 12.50 ; NORTHERN CASS SCHOOL DIST #97 $ 249.00 ; NORTHLAND TRUSS SYSTEMS, INC $ 13,950.00 ; NORTHLAND TRUSS SYSTEMS, INC $ 19,385.00 ; NORTHWEST IRON FIREMEN INC $ 556.10 ; NOTHING BUNDT CAKES $ 216.00 ; NOVOA, MARIA $ 450.00 ; ODLAND, PAUL $ 335.00 ; OFFICE DEPOT $ 128.70 ; OFFICE DEPOT $ 177.55 ; OFFICE DEPOT $ 271.20 ; OFFICE SIGN COMPANY $ 64.12 ; OFFICE SIGN COMPANY $ 76.96 ; OFFICE SIGN COMPANY $ 1,463.41 ; OHLHAUSER, LENNY $ 546.76 ; OJEDA, RACHEL $ 450.00 ; OLSON, KARA LYN SCHMITZ $ 78.00 ; OLSON, KARA LYN SCHMITZ $ 83.00 ; OMNI GROUP INTERNATIONAL LLC $ 2,220.00 ; OPP CONSTRUCTION $ 30,622.72 ; ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY $ 244.58 ; ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY $ 293.81 ; OSTENDORF, AMANDA $ 35.00 ; OSTENDORF, KRISTINE $ 385.62 ; OURADNIK, KYLE S. $ 75.00 ; OURADNIK, KYLE S. $ 84.50 ; OVERDRIVE $ 18,000.00 ; PAN O GOLD BAKING CO $ 322.24 ; PAN O GOLD BAKING CO $ 1,148.69 ; PAN O GOLD BAKING CO $ 1,997.17 ; PAPA JOHN’S $ 110.00 ; PAPA JOHN’S $ 487.00 ; PAPA JOHN’S $ 1,057.00 ; PAPER, TONY $ 66.00 ; PAPER, TONY $ 90.00 ; PARSONS ELECTRIC $ 845.00 ; PAUL BUNYAN NURSERIES $ 234.15 ; PAWLIK, GREGORY $ 19.10 ; PAXTON PATTERSON $ 223.15 ; PEARSON $ 410.49 ; PEARSON $ 1,915.20 ; PEDERSON, KARLA $ 575.00 ; PEDERSON, KAY $ 105.00 ; PEDERSON, KAY $ 105.00 ; PEDERSON, KAY $ 140.00 ; PEDERSON, LEVI $ 117.10 ; PEETERS, SARAH $ 57.41 ; PEETERS, SARAH $ 119.40 ; PENNICK, KOBY A $ 139.50 ; PENNICK, KOBY A $ 139.50 ; PENNICK, KOBY A $ 139.50 ; PEPPER AT ECKROTH $ 652.63 ; PEPSI COLA BOTTLING $ 404.96 ; PEPSI COLA BOTTLING $ 1,013.11 ; PEPSI COLA BOTTLING $ 1,681.82 ; PEPSI COLA BOTTLING $ 1,812.99 ; PETERSON, ADDISON MAE $ 154.00 ; PETERSON, SUSAN NICOLE KENIEN $ 237.58 ; PETRO SERVE USA $ 2,769.00 ; PETSMART $ 48.75 ; PIATZ, SHANE $ 84.50 ; PIERCE LEE ROOFING, LLC $ 23,350.00 ; PINK IT FORWARD $ 1,435.50 ; PIONEER VALLEY BOOKS $ 99.00 ; PITSCO $ 209.50 ; PLAY IT AGAIN SPORTS $ 132.00 ; PLUNKETT’S PEST CONTROL $ 504.33 ; POCKET NURSE $ 233.24 ; POCKET NURSE $ 2,267.94 ; POLAR INSULATION $ 3,828.20 ; POPP BINDING & LAMINATING INC $ 291.54 ; POPPLERS MUSIC $ 3,186.64 ; POPULAR WOODWORKING $ 10.00 ; POST UP STAND $ 426.08 ; POTTER, BEN $ 84.50 ; POTTER, THOMAS $ 87.00 ; POTTY SHACKS $ 120.00 ; POWER SYSTEMS $ 111.56 ; PRAXAIR $ 73.35 ; PREMIUM WATERS, INC $ 65.99 ; PREMIUM WATERS, INC $ 134.74 ; PREMIUM WATERS, INC $ 239.68 ; PRIMUS, KYLIE $ 300.00 ; PRO-ED $ 725.70 ; PRO-ED $ 1,007.00 ; PROQUEST $ 14,639.01 ; PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS $ 45.00 ; PURE HEALTH SOLUTIONS $ 90.00 ; PUTNAM, DESIRAE $ 70.00 ; QUINTUS, MATTHEW STEPHEN $ 60.01 ; R & R PETROLEUM EQUIP SALES $ 240.00 ; RACE PACE SWIM GEAR $ 547.50 ; RAMADA $ 345.60 ; RAMKOTA HOTEL $ 186.40 ; RAPTOR TECHNOLOGIES $ 7,000.00 ; RATWIK, ROSZAK & MALONEY, P.A. $ 5,156.35 ; REALLY GOOD STUFF $ 26.94 ; REALLY GOOD STUFF $ 503.90 ; RED RIVER LANES $ 533.00 ; RED RIVER ZOO $ 263.50 ; REFRIGERATION HEATING INC $ 2,023.72 ; RENEGADE PHOTOGRAPHY $ 250.00 ; RENNEBERG HARDWOODS INC $ 1,199.00 ; RENNEBERG HARDWOODS INC $ 2,052.33 ; RETROFIT COMPANIES $ 502.80 ; RETROFIT COMPANIES $ 655.00 ; RHEAULT, ALLISON A $ 35.00 ; RHEAULT, ALLISON A $ 70.00 ; RHEAULT, ALLISON A $ 140.00 ; RICHARDSON, GRANT $ 133.50 ; RICHARDSON, GRANT $ 181.00 ; RICK ELECTRIC INC $ 3,532.50 ; RIDDELL/ALL AMERICAN SPORTS $ 2,312.81 ; RIGELS, INC $ 699.00 ; RIGELS, INC $ 789.00 ; RIGGS, CALVIN $ 84.50 ; RIGGS, MARK R $ 84.50 ; RINAS, ALEXIS $ 155.85 ; RISE VISION $ 23.14 ; RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGIES INC $ 32,316.00 ; ROACH, KENDRA $ 61.20 ; ROCHESTER 100, INC $ 135.00 ; ROCHESTER ARMORED CAR CO $ 561.84 ; ROCKLER $ 145.96 ; RODEWAY INN $ 665.60 ; ROHLOFF, PRESTON $ 66.00 ; ROHLOFF, PRESTON $ 90.00 ; ROSENBERG, MARY $ 13.89 ; RUSSO’S BOOKS $ 266.86 ; RWP $ 5,000.00 ; RWP $ 6,000.00 ; RWP $ 6,250.75 ; S & S LANDSCAPING $ 2,220.00 ; S & S PROMOTIONAL GROUP $ 135.90 ; S & S PROMOTIONAL GROUP $ 1,037.00 ; S & S PROMOTIONAL GROUP $ 1,552.81 ; SAGER, MADELYNNE $ 5.82 ; SAHR, JENNIFER $ 119.91 ; SAHR, JENNIFER $ 237.58 ; SAM’S CLUB $ 1,908.11 ; SANDMAN, ELEANOR $ 54.40 ; SANDMAN, MARK A. $ 84.50 ; SANDY’S DONUTS $ 142.28 ; SANDY’S DONUTS $ 205.55 ; SANFORD $ 65.00 ; SAVAGEAU, CHRIS $ 450.00 ; SAVILLE, STEVEN B $ 44.01 ; SCANTRON $ 1,592.50 ; SCHEELS $ 1,405.87 ; SCHELL, KAYLEE JO $ 179.00 ; SCHLEICHER, SARAH $ 101.00 ; SCHLEICHER, SARAH $ 139.50 ; SCHLEICHER, SARAH $ 279.00 ; SCHMITZ, ANN L $ 87.00 ; SCHMITZ, ANN L $ 92.00 ; SCHMITZ, ANN L $ 184.00 ; SCHOB, SANDRA A $ 56.00 ; SCHOB, SANDRA A $ 56.00 ; SCHOLASTIC $ 560.34 ; SCHOLASTIC $ 2,624.23 ; SCHOLASTIC $ 6,902.00 ; SCHOOL HEALTH $ 2,112.18 ; SCHOOL SPECIALTY $ 1,992.62 ; SCHOOL SPECIALTY $ 4,620.33 ; SCHOOLMART $ 2,664.85 ; SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE $ 414.00 ; SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE $ 679.50 ; SCHWINDEN, CRAIG $ 84.50 ; SCOTT’S ELECTRIC $ 40,921.11 ; SEEC $ 596.15 ; SEELIG, LINDSAY $ 17.50 ; SELE, NATHAN D $ 84.50 ; SELLDEN, TREVOR $ 66.00 ; SELLDEN, TREVOR $ 90.00 ; SERKLAND LAW FIRM $ 1,929.59 ; SHAR PRODUCTS COMPANY $ 200.64 ; SHAW, ADAM $ 66.00 ; SHAW, ADAM $ 90.00 ; SHOCKMAN, TOM $ 84.50 ; SIGN PRO $ 1,055.00 ; SIGNATURE CONCEPTS $ 3,725.37 ; SIMONSON LUMBER $ 22,296.35 ; SIR SPEEDY $ 245.18 ; SIR SPEEDY $ 1,804.00 ; SIR SPEEDY $ 2,749.35 ; SKATECITY $ 567.00 ; SKM COLLECTIONS $ 181.31 ; SKM COLLECTIONS $ 209.78 ; SLACK, DEBRA K $ 125.50 ; SMEDSHAMMER, VONNE $ 70.00 ; SMEDSHAMMER, VONNE $ 105.00 ; SMITH, SARA ANDREA $ 366.86 ; SMITHCO $ 33,062.64 ; SNO SITES $ 250.00 ; SOEHREN, SEAN $ 75.82 ; SOLUTIONS $ 300.00 ; SOUTHEAST REGION CTE $ 4,100.00 ; SOUTHEAST REGION CTE $ 13,035.25 ; SPARKLIGHT $ 39.37 ; SPARKLIGHT $ 1,190.50 ; SPHERO $ 1,821.32 ; STAHLS’ TRANSFER EXPRESS $ 81.42 ; STAHLS’ TRANSFER EXPRESS $ 157.80 ; STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE $ 577.70 ; STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE $ 2,460.66 ; STEEN, JERED $ 43.43 ; STEIN’S $ 660.63 ; STEIN’S $ 696.00 ; STEIN’S $ 4,029.48 ; STENHOUSE PUBLISHERS $ 2,304.00 ; STEVE WEISS MUSIC, INC $ 72.95 ; STOKKE, ALYSSA $ 930.00 ; STOMMES, ADRIONNA $ 175.00 ; STURM, KAYLA $ 930.00 ; SUBWAY $ 1,784.15 ; SUPER DUPER $ 252.70 ; SUPER DUPER $ 259.90 ; SWEETWATER $ 1,574.23 ; SYSCO $ 465.13 ; SYSCO $ 66,240.36 ; SYSCO $ 66,264.15 ; SYSCO $ 137,232.23 ; TAUNTON DIRECT $ 34.95 ; TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP $ 689.94 ; TEACHER’S CURRICULUM INSTITUTE $ 1,662.00 ; TEACHERS PAY TEACHERS $ 40.98 ; TECTA AMERICA DAKOTAS $ 741.60 ; TECTA AMERICA DAKOTAS $ 2,427.74 ; TECTA AMERICA DAKOTAS $ 2,682.50 ; THISETH, KRISTI $ 162.12 ; THOMPSON, ELIZABETH I. $ 51.30 ; THROW, JOSEPH $ 44.86 ; THUNDER ROAD $ 445.00 ; TIBOR, HANNAH $ 450.00 ; TIDY UP CLEANING $ 12,000.00 ; TNT KID’S FITNESS $ 9,253.80 ; TOAY, BRIAN PATRICK $ 36.00 ; TOAY, BRIAN PATRICK $ 36.00 ; TOOLS4READING $ 500.00 ; TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES $ 907.86 ; TRAILL PAINTING COMPANY $ 694.98 ; TRAINING ROOM INC $ 1,119.00 ; TRANS-MISSISSIPPI BIOLOGICAL $ 768.93 ; TRICORNE AUDIO, INC $ 8,373.96 ; TROXELL COMMUNICATIONS INC $ 97.44 ; TROXELL COMMUNICATIONS INC $ 17,741.90 ; TURNITIN $ 1,937.85 ; UCA/UDA CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES $ 1,689.00 ; UGGERUD, SUZANNE $ 54.10 ; ULINE $ 1,483.15 ; ULINE $ 1,776.24 ; UND $ 14,250.00 ; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $ 132.00 ; UNITED RENTALS $ 686.70 ; UNITED RENTALS $ 2,266.85 ; UNITED SOCCER COACHES MEMBERSHIP $ 125.00 ; UNITI FIBER $ 4,837.86 ; UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA $ 6,958.63 ; URGENTMED $ 150.00 ; US BANK $ 12,674.52 ; US BANK $ 43,881.25 ; US MATH RECOVERY COUNCIL $ 175.00 ; US MATH RECOVERY COUNCIL $ 484.00 ; US MATH RECOVERY COUNCIL $ 2,080.00 ; VALLEY ATHLETIC $ 43,355.00 ; VALLEY BUS COMPANY $ 19,650.87 ; VALLEY BUS COMPANY $ 324,100.75 ; VALLEY BUS COMPANY $ 359,209.07 ; VALLEY HARDWOOD SUPPLY $ 6,920.32 ; VALLEY REGION VOLLEYBALL $ 250.00 ; VALLEY REGION VOLLEYBALL $ 500.00 ; VARSITY SPIRIT $ 428.95 ; VARSITY SPIRIT $ 818.80 ; VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY $ 1,484.99 ; VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY $ 1,485.00 ; VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY $ 2,639.09 ; VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY $ 25,185.60 ; VERIZON WIRELESS $ 2,044.00 ; VERIZON WIRELESS $ 3,375.41 ; VETSCH, ELLIE $ 450.00 ; VEX ROBOTICS $ 148.48 ; VOIANCE LANGUAGE SERVICES $ 290.88 ; VOSGERAU, DENNIS $ 139.50 ; WAHPETON PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST $ 150.00 ; WALLING, MICHAEL G. $ 8,750.00 ; WALMART $ 1,438.46 ; WALMART $ 4,252.19 ; WALSTROM, TANNER $ 75.00 ; WALSTROM, TANNER $ 225.00 ; WARD, GRACE $ 450.00 ; WARD’S NATURAL SCIENCE $ 204.82 ; WENAAS, KIRSTEN $ 104.89 ; WENAAS, LARRY $ 279.00 ; WEST MUSIC COMPANY, INC $ 169.75 ; WEST MUSIC COMPANY, INC $ 2,210.00 ; WEST SIDE STEEL $ 676.20 ; WESTERHAUSEN, RENITA $ 135.00 ; WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES $ 194.70 ; WEX $ 18.60 ; WEX $ 22.05 ; WEX $ 53.10 ; WEX $ 68.75 ; WEX $ 75.66 ; WEX $ 253.00 ; WEX $ 394.60 ; WEX $ 402.85 ; WEX $ 441.63 ; WEX $ 509.12 ; WEX $ 567.43 ; WEX $ 650.39 ; WEX $ 810.00 ; WEX $ 877.20 ; WEX $ 950.00 ; WEX $ 964.00 ; WEX $ 1,139.69 ; WEX $ 1,457.80 ; WEX $ 1,462.03 ; WEX $ 1,815.49 ; WEX $ 2,762.25 ; WEX $ 2,762.25 ; WEX $ 3,214.00 ; WEX $ 12,825.41 ; WEX $ 22,600.00 ; WHITE, RICKY $ 250.00 ; WHITE, RICKY $ 1,500.00 ; WIGGS, IVY PEARL $ 70.00 ; WIGGS, IVY PEARL $ 70.00 ; WILSON, DEAN $ 284.06 ; WIXO, HAILEY F. $ 70.00 ; WOEHL, BRAD $ 84.50 ; WONDER WORKSHOP $ 1,123.99 ; WOODCRAFT $ 19.99 ; WOODSMITH $ 29.00 ; WOODWORKER’S JOURNAL $ 19.95 ; WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCE $ 350.00 ; WORLD OF OFFICIATING $ 1,280.00 ; XCEL ENERGY $ 230.29 ; XCEL ENERGY $ 17,180.56 ; XCEL ENERGY $ 29,598.73 ; XCEL ENERGY $ 202,043.83 ; XEROX CORPORATION $ 884.97 ; YAEGER, JAIME $ 102.42 ; YHR PARTNERS $ 8,347.77 ; YOUTH FRONTIERS, INC $ 3,370.00 ; ZACHRISON, AIMEE $ 137.50 ; ZANDBROZ $ 261.03 ; ZERR BERG ARCHITECTS INC $ 38,225.30 ; ZIMMERMAN, BETHANY $ 30.46 (Dec. 22, 2021)